-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Ensure mocks config available #2823
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@ | |||
require "active_job/base" | |||
require "active_job/arguments" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We check if mocks are defined here. Should we do the same here instead of requiring what’s not used?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The difference is here we are actually using it
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We’re only using it if verified partial doubles are checked, right? Which is not the case when RSpec is configured to mock with an alternative framework. Or am I missing something? It looks like before #2808 everything worked just fine, but apparently rspec-mocks were not required and RSpec::Mocks was not defined, and no problem.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We don't want to skip the check just because someone is using another mocking framework
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If someone is using another framework, the result of the check will always be false. So it’s not that we skip it, we shortcut it.
9483480
to
6921c0a
Compare
@JonRowe Yes, this works for me! |
Should fix #2822