S0098 config

[otterdahl]

Issue: #448

Work in progress. It should validate that the response isn't an empty string

[otterdahl]

@emiltin The S0098 status doesn't seem to be implemented in the TLC gem?

[emiltin]

@emiltin The S0098 status doesn't seem to be implemented in the TLC gem?

Right, it just implements enough to pass tests. But I can add support for S0098.

[emiltin]

Added suppport for S0098 in the rsmp gem, and pulled it into this PR

[emiltin]

I have to leave for today, back tuesday. Thanks for the PR

[emiltin]

The test that was added checks that a status response is received. Should we also check that the received attributes have reasonable values, e.g. are not empty?

[emiltin]

Gem TCL now passes all tests.

[otterdahl]

The test that was added checks that a status response is received. Should we also check that the received attributes have reasonable values, e.g. are not empty?

Yes. That would be good.

[emiltin]

Are there expections for the value of q for any of the attributes?

[emiltin]

The test now verifies that attributes are not empty.

Should we prevent empty attributes in our schema in the first place?

[emiltin]

The ITC-3 seems not to implement S0098, returning "unknown status ID". It's running SXL 1.0.15, where S0098 should be available, right? At least that's how the test is currently tagged.

[emiltin]

@sveitech the ITC-3 seems not to implement S0098?
https://github.com/rsmp-nordic/rsmp_validator/actions/runs/12396523470/job/34604744216?pr=468

[SwarcoPalm]

@sveitech the ITC-3 seems not to implement S0098? https://github.com/rsmp-nordic/rsmp_validator/actions/runs/12396523470/job/34604744216?pr=468

It requires a bit of setup, we will enable it on the test controller

[emiltin]

@anezsergi i had to add the 'kapsch-etx' label to the runner again, since it was replaced. Let's see if it picks up jobs now:
https://github.com/rsmp-nordic/rsmp_validator/actions/runs/12396523463/job/34648649864?pr=468