DBUnit rules (Project MIGRATED to Database Rider organization)
So you can rule the database in your JUnit tests!
This project aims for bringing DBUnit closer to your JUnit tests.
A lot of this work is based on Arquillian persistence extension and focus on simplicity (one dep). If you need a more robust and reliable solution (tests closer to production), I’d suggest arquillian persistence.
Consider the following (jpa) entities:
@Entity
public class User {
@Id
@GeneratedValue
private long id;
private String name;
@OneToMany(mappedBy = "user")
private List<Tweet> tweets;
@OneToMany(mappedBy = "followedUser")
private List<Follower> followers;
//getters/setters
}
@Entity
public class Tweet {
@Id
@GeneratedValue
private String id;
@Size(min = 1, max = 140)
private String content;
private Integer likes;
@Temporal(TemporalType.TIMESTAMP)
private Date date;
@ManyToOne
private User user;
}
@Entity
public class Follower {
@Id
@GeneratedValue
private long id;
@JoinColumn(name = "follower_id")
private User followerUser;
@ManyToOne
@JoinColumn(name = "user_id")
private User followedUser;
}
and the following dbunit yaml dataset:
user:
- id: 1
name: "@realpestano"
- id: 2
name: "@dbunit"
tweet:
- id: abcdef12345
content: "dbunit rules!"
user_id: 1
follower:
- id: 1
user_id: 1
follower_id: 2
You should be able to prepare your database before test execution, like below:
@RunWith(JUnit4.class)
public class UserIt {
@Rule
public EntityManagerProvider emProvider = EntityManagerProvider.instance("rules-it");
@Rule
public DBUnitRule dbUnitRule = DBUnitRule.instance(emProvider.getConnection());
@Test
@DataSet(value = "datasets/yml/users.yml")
public void shouldLoadUserFollowers() {
User user = (User) emProvider.em().createQuery("select u from User u left join fetch u.followers where u.id = 1").getSingleResult();
assertThat(user).isNotNull();
assertThat(user.getId()).isEqualTo(1);
assertThat(user.getTweets()).hasSize(1);
assertEquals(user.getTweets().get(0).getContent(), "dbunit rules!");
assertThat(user.getFollowers()).isNotNull().hasSize(1);
Follower expectedFollower = new Follower(2,1);
assertThat(user.getFollowers()).contains(expectedFollower);
}
ℹ️
|
EntityManagerProvider is a simple JUnit rule that creates a JPA entityManager (and caches it) for each test. DBunit rule don’t depend on EntityManagerProvider, it only needs a JDBC connection; |
A getting started guide can be found here http://rmpestano.github.io/dbunit-rules-sample/dbunit-rules.html.
For main features overview see project living documentation: http://rmpestano.github.io/dbunit-rules/documentation.html.
There are a lot of examples that can also be used as documentation.
The examples module which contains:
And also each module contain a lot of tests that you can use as example.
This module is the basis for subsequent modules. It contains a JUnit rule (shown above) to configure its main component, the DataSet executor.
<dependency>
<groupId>com.github.dbunit-rules</groupId>
<artifactId>core</artifactId>
<version>0.15.1</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
ℹ️
|
It will bring the following (transitive) dependencies to your test classpath: <dependency>
<groupId>org.dbunit</groupId>
<artifactId>dbunit</artifactId>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.yaml</groupId>
<artifactId>snakeyaml</artifactId>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.codehaus.jackson</groupId>
<artifactId>jackson-mapper-lgpl</artifactId>
</dependency> |
A DataSet executor is a component which creates DBUnit datasets. Datasets are "sets" of data (tables and rows) that represent the state of the database. DataSets are defined as textual files in YAML, XML, JSON, CSV or XLS format, see examples here.
As in DBUnit Rule, dataset executor
just needs a JDBC connection to be instantiated:
import static com.github.dbunit.rules.util.EntityManagerProvider.em;
import static com.github.dbunit.rules.util.EntityManagerProvider.instance;
@RunWith(JUnit4.class)
public class DataSetExecutorIt {
public EntityManagerProvider emProvider = instance("executor-it");
private static DataSetExecutorImpl executor;
@BeforeClass
public static void setup() {
executor = DataSetExecutorImpl.instance(new ConnectionHolderImpl(emProvider.getConnection()));
}
@Test
public void shouldSeedUserDataSetUsingExecutor() {
DataSetConfig dataSetConfig = new DataSetConfig("datasets/yml/users.yml");(1)
executor.createDataSet(dataSetConfig);(2)
User user = (User) em().createQuery("select u from User u where u.id = 1").getSingleResult();
assertThat(user).isNotNull();
assertThat(user.getId()).isEqualTo(1);
}
}
-
As we are not using @Rule, which is responsible for reading @DataSet annotation, we have to provide DataSetConfig so executor can create the dataset.
-
this is done implicitly by @Rule DBUnitRule.
DataSet executor setup and logic is hidden
by DBUnit @Rule and @DataSet annotation:
import static com.github.dbunit.rules.util.EntityManagerProvider.em;
import static org.assertj.core.api.Assertions.assertThat;
@RunWith(JUnit4.class)
public class ConnectionHolderIt {
@Rule
public EntityManagerProvider emProvider = EntityManagerProvider.instance("rules-it");
@Rule
public DBUnitRule dbUnitRule = DBUnitRule.
instance(() -> emProvider.getConnection());
@Test
@DataSet("yml/users.yml")
public void shouldListUsers() {
List<User> users = em().createQuery("select u from User u").getResultList();
assertThat(users).isNotNull().isNotEmpty().hasSize(2);
}
}
There are two types of configuration in DBUnit Rules: DataSet
and DBUnit
.
- DataSet Configuration
-
this basically setup the
dataset
which will be used. The only way to configure a dataset is using @DataSet annotation.It can be used at class or method level:
@Test @DataSet(value ="users.yml", strategy = SeedStrategy.UPDATE, disableConstraints = true,cleanAfter = true,transactional = true) public void shouldLoadDataSetConfigFromAnnotation(){ }
Here are possible values:
Name Description Default value
Dataset file name using test resources folder as root directory. Multiple, comma separated, dataset file names can be provided.
""
executorId
Name of dataset executor for the given dataset.
DataSetExecutorImpl.DEFAULT_EXECUTOR_ID
strategy
DataSet seed strategy. Possible values are: CLEAN_INSERT, INSERT, REFRESH and UPDATE.
CLEAN_INSERT, meaning that DBUnit will clean and then insert data in tables present in provided dataset.
useSequenceFiltering
If true dbunit will look at constraints and dataset to try to determine the correct ordering for the SQL statements.
true
tableOrdering
A list of table names used to reorder DELETE operations to prevent failures due to circular dependencies.
""
disableConstraints
Disable database constraints.
false
cleanBefore
If true DBUnit Rules will try to delete database before test in a smart way by using table ordering and brute force.
false
cleanAfter
If true DBUnit Rules will try to delete database after test in a smart way by using table ordering and brute force.
false
transactional
If true a transaction will be started before test and committed after test execution.
false
executeStatementsBefore
A list of jdbc statements to execute before test.
{}
executeStatementsAfter
A list of jdbc statements to execute after test.
{}
executeScriptsBefore
A list of sql script files to execute before test. Note that commands inside sql file must be separated by
;
.{}
executeScriptsAfter
A list of sql script files to execute after test. Note that commands inside sql file must be separated by
;
.{}
- DBUnit Configuration
-
this basically setup
DBUnit
itself. It can be configured by @DBUnit annotation (class or method level) and dbunit.yml file present in test resources folder.@Test @DBUnit(cacheConnection = true, cacheTableNames = false, allowEmptyFields = true,batchSize = 50) public void shouldLoadDBUnitConfigViaAnnotation() { }
Here is a dbunit.yml example, also the default values:
src/test/resources/dbunit.ymlcacheConnection: true cacheTableNames: true leakHunter: false properties: batchedStatements: false qualifiedTableNames: false caseSensitiveTableNames: false batchSize: 100 fetchSize: 100 allowEmptyFields: false escapePattern: connectionConfig: driver: "" url: "" user: "" password: ""
ℹ️@DBUnit
annotation takes precedence overdbunit.yml
global configuration which will be used only if the annotation is not present.
💡
|
Both configuration mechanisms work for all DBUnit Rules modules. |
As seen in examples above DBUnit
needs a JDBC connection to be instantiated. To avoid creating connection for each test you can define it in dbunit.yml for all tests or define in @DBUnit on each test.
ℹ️
|
@DBUnit annotation takes precedence over dbunit.yml global configuration.
|
@RunWith(JUnit4.class)
@DBUnit(url = "jdbc:hsqldb:mem:test;DB_CLOSE_DELAY=-1", driver = "org.hsqldb.jdbcDriver", user = "sa") (1)
public class ConnectionConfigIt {
@Rule
public DBUnitRule dbUnitRule = DBUnitRule.instance(); (2)
@BeforeClass
public static void initDB(){
//trigger db creation
EntityManagerProvider.instance("rules-it");
}
@Test
@DataSet(value = "datasets/yml/user.yml")
public void shouldSeedFromDeclaredConnection() {
User user = (User) em().createQuery("select u from User u where u.id = 1").getSingleResult();
assertThat(user).isNotNull();
assertThat(user.getId()).isEqualTo(1);
}
}
-
driver class can be ommited in new JDBC drivers since version 4.
-
Note that the rule instantiation doesn’t need a connection anymore.
❗
|
As CDI module depends on a produced entity manager, connection configuration will be ignored. |
DBUnit Rule can be chained with other rules so you can define execution order among rules.
In example below [EntityManagerProvider rule] executes before DBUnit rule
:
EntityManagerProvider emProvider = EntityManagerProvider.instance("rules-it");
@Rule
public TestRule theRule = RuleChain.outerRule(emProvider).
around(DBUnitRule.instance(emProvider.connection()));
Each executor has a JDBC connection so multiple databases can be handled by using multiple dataset executors:
import static com.github.dbunit.rules.util.EntityManagerProvider.instance;
@RunWith(JUnit4.class)
public class MultipleExecutorsIt {
private static List<DataSetExecutorImpl> executors = new ArrayList<>;
@BeforeClass
public static void setup() { (1)
executors.add(DataSetExecutorImpl.instance("executor1", new ConnectionHolderImpl(instance("executor1-pu").getConnection())));
executors.add(DataSetExecutorImpl.instance("executor2", new ConnectionHolderImpl(instance("executor2-pu").getConnection())));
}
@Test
public void shouldSeedUserDataSet() {
for (DataSetExecutorImpl executor : executors) {
DataSetConfig dataSetConfig = new DataSetConfig("datasets/yml/users.yml");
executor.createDataSet(dataSetConfig);
User user = (User) EntityManagerProvider.instance(executor.getId() + "-pu").em().createQuery("select u from User u where u.id = 1").getSingleResult();
assertThat(user).isNotNull();
assertThat(user.getId()).isEqualTo(1);
}
}
}
-
As you can see each executor is responsible for a database, in case a JPA persistence unit
Also note that the same can be done using @Rule but pay attention that you must provide executor id in @DataSet annotation.
@Rule
public EntityManagerProvider emProvider1 = EntityManagerProvider.instance("dataset1-pu");
@Rule
public EntityManagerProvider emProvider2 = EntityManagerProvider.instance("dataset2-pu");
@Rule
public DBUnitRule exec1Rule = DBUnitRule.instance("exec1",emProvider1.getConnection());(1)
@Rule
public DBUnitRule exec2Rule = DBUnitRule.instance("exec2",emProvider2.getConnection());
@Test
@DataSet(value = "datasets/yml/users.yml",disableConstraints = true, executorId = "exec1") (2)
public void shouldSeedDataSetDisablingContraints() {
User user = (User) emProvider1.em().createQuery("select u from User u where u.id = 1").getSingleResult();
assertThat(user).isNotNull();
assertThat(user.getId()).isEqualTo(1);
}
@Test
@DataSet(value = "datasets/yml/users.yml",disableConstraints = true, executorId = "exec2")
public void shouldSeedDataSetDisablingContraints2() {
User user = (User) emProvider2.em().createQuery("select u from User u where u.id = 1").getSingleResult();
assertThat(user).isNotNull();
assertThat(user.getId()).isEqualTo(1);
}
-
exec1 is the id of executor reponsible for dataset1-pu
-
executorId must match id provided in @Rule annotation
Using @ExpectedDataSet
annotation you can specify the database state you expect after test execution, example:
user:
- id: 1
name: "expected user1"
- id: 2
name: "expected user2"
@Test
@ExpectedDataSet(value = "yml/expectedUsers.yml",ignoreCols = "id")
public void shouldMatchExpectedDataSet() {
User u = new User();
u.setName("expected user1");
User u2 = new User();
u2.setName("expected user2");
emProvider.tx().begin();
emProvider.em().persist(u);
emProvider.em().persist(u2);
emProvider.tx().commit();
}
ℹ️
|
As you probably noticed, there is no need for assertions in the test itself. |
Now with an assertion error:
@Test
@ExpectedDataSet(value = "yml/expectedUsers.yml",ignoreCols = "id")
public void shouldMatchExpectedDataSet() {
User u = new User();
u.setName("non expected user1");
User u2 = new User();
u2.setName("non expected user2");
emProvider.tx().begin();
emProvider.em().persist(u);
emProvider.em().persist(u2);
emProvider.tx().commit();
}
And here is how the error is shown in JUnit console:
Expected :expected user1
Actual :non expected user1
<Click to see difference>
at org.dbunit.assertion.JUnitFailureFactory.createFailure(JUnitFailureFactory.java:39)
at org.dbunit.assertion.DefaultFailureHandler.createFailure(DefaultFailureHandler.java:97)
at org.dbunit.assertion.DefaultFailureHandler.handle(DefaultFailureHandler.java:223)
at com.github.dbunit.rules.assertion.DataSetAssert.compareData(DataSetAssert.java:94)
💡
|
You can also use user:
- id: "regex:\\d+" #any number
name: regex:^expected user.* #starts with regex
- id: "regex:\\d+"
name: regex:.*user2$ #ends with example The test remains the same as above but without the need to |
In case of ExpectedDataSet
you’ll usually need a transaction to modify database in order to match expected dataset. In such case you can use a transactional test:
@Test
@DataSet(transactional=true)
@ExpectedDataSet(value = "yml/expectedUsers.yml",ignoreCols = "id")
public void shouldMatchExpectedDataSet() {
User u = new User();
u.setName("non expected user1");
User u2 = new User();
u2.setName("non expected user2");
emProvider.em().persist(u);
emProvider.em().persist(u2);
}
Note that DBUnit Rules will start a transaction before test and commit the transaction after test execution but before expected dataset comparison.
Below is a pure JDBC example where commented code is not needed because the test is transactional:
@Test
@DataSet(cleanBefore = true, transactional = true)
@ExpectedDataSet(value = "usersInserted.yml")
public void shouldInserUsers() throws SQLException {
Connection connection = flyway.getDataSource().getConnection();
//connection.setAutoCommit(false); //transactional=true
java.sql.Statement statement = connection.createStatement(ResultSet.TYPE_SCROLL_SENSITIVE,
ResultSet.CONCUR_UPDATABLE);
statement.addBatch("INSERT INTO User VALUES (1, 'user1')");
statement.addBatch("INSERT INTO User VALUES (2, 'user2')");
statement.addBatch("INSERT INTO User VALUES (3, 'user3')");
statement.executeBatch();
//connection.commit();
//connection.setAutoCommit(false);
}
💡
|
Above example code (which uses JUnit5 and Flyway) can be found here. |
It is a component which holds JPA entity managers for your tests. To activate it just use the EntityManagerProvider rule in your test use:
@RunWith(JUnit4.class)
public class DBUnitRulesIt {
@Rule
public EntityManagerProvider emProvider = EntityManagerProvider.instance("PU-NAME");(1)
}
-
It will retrieve the entity manager based on a test persistence.xml and store in into EntityManagerProvider which can hold multiple entity managers.
ℹ️
|
You can use @BeforeClass instead of junit rule to instantiate the provider. |
❗
|
EntityManagerProvider will cache entity manager instance to avoid creating database multiple times, you just need to be careful with JPA first level cache between tests (EntityManagerProvider Rule and CDI interceptor clears first level cache before each test). |
Now you can use emProvider.getConnection() to retrieve jdbc connection and emProvider.em() to retrieve underlying entityManager.
PU-NAME refers to test persistence.xml unit name:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<persistence version="2.0" xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/persistence" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/persistence http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/persistence/persistence_2_0.xsd">
<persistence-unit name="PU-NAME" transaction-type="RESOURCE_LOCAL">
<class>com.github.dbunit.rules.model.User</class>
<class>com.github.dbunit.rules.model.Tweet</class>
<class>com.github.dbunit.rules.model.Follower</class>
<properties>
<property name="javax.persistence.jdbc.url" value="jdbc:hsqldb:mem:test;DB_CLOSE_DELAY=-1"/>
<property name="javax.persistence.jdbc.driver" value="org.hsqldb.jdbcDriver"/>
<property name="javax.persistence.schema-generation.database.action" value="drop-and-create"/>
<property name="javax.persistence.jdbc.user" value="sa"/>
<property name="javax.persistence.jdbc.password" value=""/>
<property name="eclipselink.logging.level" value="INFO"/>
<property name="eclipselink.logging.level.sql" value="FINE"/>
<property name="eclipselink.logging.parameters" value="false"/>
</properties>
</persistence-unit>
</persistence>
ℹ️
|
It will only work with transaction-type="RESOURCE_LOCAL" because internally it uses Persistence.createEntityManagerFactory(unitName) to get entityManager instance. |
Above JPA configuration depends on hsqldb (an in memory database) and eclipse link (JPA provider):
<dependency>
<groupId>org.eclipse.persistence</groupId>
<artifactId>eclipselink</artifactId>
<version>2.5.2</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.hsqldb</groupId>
<artifactId>hsqldb</artifactId>
<version>2.3.3</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
ℹ️
|
A hibernate entity manager config sample can be found here. |
💡
|
EntityManager provider utility also can be used in other contexts like a CDI producer, see here. |
If you use CDI in your tests then you should give a try in DBUnit rules CDI module:
<dependency>
<groupId>com.github.dbunit-rules</groupId>
<artifactId>cdi</artifactId>
<version>0.15.1</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
CDI module main component is a CDI interceptor which configures datasets before your tests. To enable DBUnit interceptor you’ll need configure it in you test beans.xml:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<beans xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee/beans_1_0.xsd">
<interceptors>
<class>com.github.dbunit.rules.cdi.DBUnitInterceptorImpl</class>
</interceptors>
</beans>
and then enable it in your tests by using @DBUnitInterceptor annotation (class or method level):
@RunWith(CdiTestRunner.class)
@DBUnitInterceptor
public class DeltaspikeUsingInterceptorIt {
@Inject
DeltaSpikeContactService contactService;
@Test
@DataSet("datasets/contacts.yml")
public void shouldQueryAllCompanies() {
assertNotNull(contactService);
assertThat(contactService.findCompanies()).hasSize(4);
}
}
❗
|
Make sure the test class itself is a CDI bean so it can be intercepted by deltaspike.testcontrol.use_test_class_as_cdi_bean=true |
this module brings a Cucumber runner which is CDI aware.
ℹ️
|
If you don’t use CDI you need to create datasets Programmatically because Cucumber official runner doesn’t support JUnit rules.
|
<dependency>
<groupId>com.github.dbunit-rules</groupId>
<artifactId>cucumber</artifactId>
<version>0.15.1</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
Now you just need to use CdiCucumberTestRunner.
Feature: Contacts test
As a user of contacts repository
I want to crud contacts
So that I can expose contacts service
Scenario Outline: search contacts
Given we have a list of constacts
When we search contacts by name "<name>"
Then we should find <result> contacts
Examples: examples1
| name | result |
| delta | 1 |
| sp | 2 |
| querydsl | 1 |
| abcd | 0 |
Scenario: delete a contact
Given we have a list of contacts
When we delete contact by id 1
Then we should not find contact 1
package com.github.dbunit.rules.examples.cucumber;
import com.github.dbunit.rules.cucumber.CdiCucumberTestRunner;
import cucumber.api.CucumberOptions;
import org.junit.runner.RunWith;
@RunWith(CdiCucumberTestRunner.class)
@CucumberOptions(
features = {"src/test/resources/features/contacts.feature"},
plugin = {"json:target/cucumber.json"}
//glue = "com.github.dbunit.rules.examples.glues" (1)
)
public class ContactFeature {
}
-
You can use glues so step definitions and the runner can be in different packages for reuse between features.
package com.github.dbunit.rules.examples.cucumber; //(1)
import com.github.dbunit.rules.api.dataset.DataSet;
import cucumber.api.java.en.Given;
import cucumber.api.java.en.Then;
import cucumber.api.java.en.When;
import org.example.jpadomain.Contact;
import org.example.jpadomain.Contact_;
import org.example.service.deltaspike.ContactRepository;
import javax.inject.Inject;
import static org.junit.Assert.assertEquals;
import static org.junit.Assert.assertNull;
@DBUnitInterceptor (2)
public class ContactSteps {
@Inject
ContactRepository contactRepository;
Long count;
@Given("^we have a list of contacts")
@DataSet("datasets/contacts.yml") //(2)
public void given() {
assertEquals(contactRepository.count(), new Long(3));
}
@When("^^we search contacts by name \"([^\"]*)\"$")
public void we_search_contacts_by_name_(String name) throws Throwable {
Contact contact = new Contact();
contact.setName(name);
count = contactRepository.countLike(contact, Contact_.name);
}
@Then("^we should find (\\d+) contacts$")
public void we_should_find_result_contacts(Long result) throws Throwable {
assertEquals(result,count);
}
@When("^we delete contact by id (\\d+)$")
public void we_delete_contact_by_id(long id) throws Throwable {
contactRepository.remove(contactRepository.findBy(id));
}
@Then("^we should not find contact (\\d+)$")
public void we_should_not_find_contacts_in_database(long id) throws Throwable {
assertNull(contactRepository.findBy(id));
}
}
-
Step definitions must be in the same package of the runner. To use different package you can use glues as commented above.
-
Activates DBUnit CDI interceptor which will read @DataSet annotation in cucumber steps to prepare the database.
You can create datasets without JUnit Rule or CDI as we saw above, here is a pure cucumber example (for the same feature above):
@RunWith(Cucumber.class)
@CucumberOptions(
features = {"src/test/resources/features/contacts-without-cdi.feature"},
plugin = {"json:target/cucumber.json"}
//glue = "com.github.dbunit.rules.examples.glues"
)
public class ContactFeatureWithoutCDI {
}
And here are the step definitions:
public class ContactStepsWithoutCDI {
EntityManagerProvider entityManagerProvider = EntityManagerProvider.newInstance("customerDB");
DataSetExecutor dbunitExecutor;
Long count;
@Before
public void setUp(){
dbunitExecutor = DataSetExecutorImpl.instance(new ConnectionHolderImpl(entityManagerProvider.connection()));
em().clear();//important to clear JPA first level cache between scenarios
}
@Given("^we have a list of contacts2$")
public void given() {
dbunitExecutor.createDataSet(new DataSetConfig("contacts.yml"));
assertEquals(em().createQuery("select count(c.id) from Contact c").getSingleResult(), new Long(3));
}
@When("^^we search contacts by name \"([^\"]*)\"2$")
public void we_search_contacts_by_name_(String name) throws Throwable {
Contact contact = new Contact();
contact.setName(name);
Query query = em().createQuery("select count(c.id) from Contact c where UPPER(c.name) like :name");
query.setParameter("name","%"+name.toUpperCase()+"%");
count = (Long) query.getSingleResult();
}
@Then("^we should find (\\d+) contacts2$")
public void we_should_find_result_contacts(Long result) throws Throwable {
assertEquals(result,count);
}
@When("^we delete contact by id (\\d+) 2$")
public void we_delete_contact_by_id(long id) throws Throwable {
tx().begin();
em().remove(em().find(Contact.class,id));
tx().commit();
}
@Then("^we should not find contact (\\d+) 2$")
public void we_should_not_find_contacts_in_database(long id) throws Throwable {
assertNull(em().find(Contact.class,id));
}
}
JUnit 5 is the new version of JUnit and comes with a new extension model, so instead of rules you will use extensions in your tests. See example below:
<dependency>
<groupId>com.github.dbunit-rules</groupId>
<artifactId>junit5</artifactId>
<version>0.15.1</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
@ExtendWith(DBUnitExtension.class)
@RunWith(JUnitPlatform.class)
public class DBUnitJUnit5Test {
private ConnectionHolder connectionHolder = () -> instance("junit5-pu").connection(); (1)
@Test
@DataSet("users.yml")
public void shouldListUsers() {
List<User> users = em().createQuery("select u from User u").getResultList();
assertThat(users).isNotNull().isNotEmpty().hasSize(2);
}
-
DBUnit extension will get JDBC connection by reflection so you need to declare a field or method with
ConnectionHolder
as return type.
💡
|
You can configure JDBC connection using @DBUnit annotation or dbunit.yml, see JDBC Connection. |
Leak hunter is a component based on this blog post which counts open jdbc connections before and after test execution.
To enable it just use leakHunter = true in @DBUnit
annotation, example:
@RunWith(JUnit4.class)
@DBUnit(leakHunter = true)
public class LeakHunterIt {
@Rule
public DBUnitRule dbUnitRule = DBUnitRule.instance(new ConnectionHolderImpl(getConnection()));
@Rule
public ExpectedException exception = ExpectedException.none();
@Test
@DataSet("yml/user.yml")
public void shouldFindConnectionLeak() {
exception.expect(LeakHunterException.class); (1)
exception.expectMessage("Execution of method shouldFindConnectionLeak left 1 open connection(s).");
createLeak();
}
@Test
@DataSet("yml/user.yml")
public void shouldFindTwoConnectionLeaks() {
exception.expect(LeakHunterException.class);
exception.expectMessage("Execution of method shouldFindTwoConnectionLeaks left 2 open connection(s).");
createLeak();
createLeak();
}
@Test
@DataSet("yml/user.yml")
@DBUnit(leakHunter = false)
public void shouldNotFindConnectionLeakWhenHunterIsDisabled() {
createLeak();
}
}
-
If number of connections after test execution are greater than before then a LeakHunterException will be raised.
💡
|
Complete source code of example above can be found here. |
Manual creation of datasets is a very error prone task. In order to export database state after test execution into datasets files one can use @ExportDataSet Annotation or use DataSetExporter component.
@Test
@DataSet("datasets/yml/users.yml")
@ExportDataSet(format = DataSetFormat.XML,outputName="target/exported/xml/allTables.xml")
public void shouldExportAllTablesInXMLFormat() {
//data inserted inside method can be exported
}
After above test execution all tables will be exported to a xml dataset.
ℹ️
|
XML, YML, JSON, XLS and CSV formats are supported. |
💡
|
Full example above (and other related tests) can be found here. |
Following table shows all exporter configuration options:
Name | Description | Default |
---|---|---|
format |
Exported dataset file format. |
YML |
includeTables |
A list of table names to include in exported dataset. |
Default is empty which means ALL tables. |
queryList |
A list of select statements which the result will used in exported dataset. |
{} |
dependentTables |
If true will bring dependent tables of declared includeTables. |
false |
outputName |
Name (and path) of output file. |
"" |
You can also export DataSets without @ExportDataSet
by using DataSetExporter component programmatically:
@Test
@DataSet(cleanBefore=true)
public void shouldExportYMLDataSetWithoutAnnotations() throws SQLException, DatabaseUnitException{
tx().begin();
User u1 = new User();
u1.setName("u1");
em().persist(u1);//just insert a user and assert it is present in exported dataset
tx().commit();
DataSetExporter.getInstance().export(emProvider.connection(),
new DataSetExportConfig().outputFileName("target/user.yml"));
File ymlDataSet = new File("target/user.yml");
assertThat(ymlDataSet).exists();
assertThat(contentOf(ymlDataSet)).
contains("USER:"+NEW_LINE +
" - ID: 1"+NEW_LINE +
" NAME: \"u1\""+NEW_LINE);
}