Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactor: remove private link related connection #18975
refactor: remove private link related connection #18975
Changes from 7 commits
449f09b
03b47bb
589d9ff
6c1b912
de10c92
45aba09
192c838
9395966
cd0c919
3fcdb3f
8f994e9
618444d
1fc823c
635ca5e
2059a8f
21ef867
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we should deprecate the unnecessary fields in
message PrivateLinkService
, only keeping the necessary fields forcreate source
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In long term, the
create connection
statement should be kept, but the semantic of it is simply storing the user-specificendpoint
andtargets
, instead of calling AWS API to create a private link. This aligns with the style of the connection RFC.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am not sure if it is safe to remove the field. The exisiting connection still need this.
After the cloud portal supports building subnets for private link (long ago), we no longer encourage using
create connection
for this case.IIRC, we store the two fields together with other connector props, rather than in the connection catalog.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I see. Then we may deprecate the entire
message PrivateLinkService
. See also https://stackoverflow.com/a/52787662/5739882.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does the change involve a new migration, cc @yezizp2012 ?