Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reorganize Constitution Sections #13

Closed
2 tasks done
rhochgraf21 opened this issue Aug 25, 2023 · 2 comments
Closed
2 tasks done

Reorganize Constitution Sections #13

rhochgraf21 opened this issue Aug 25, 2023 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
duplicate This issue or pull request already exists

Comments

@rhochgraf21
Copy link
Owner

rhochgraf21 commented Aug 25, 2023

Check one:

  • Semantic Issue: something about the meaning of the text is different
  • Non-semantic Issue: Spelling, grammar, or formatting changes.

Summary of issue:

needs discussion

the early draft included the following sections:

  • Introduction
  • Structure
  • Membership
  • Officers of the House
  • General Operations of the House
  • Voting
  • Modifications to the Constitution
  • Judicial
  • Adherence to University Policy

This included three major refactors:

1 - moving Packet and Evaluations into the Membership section
2 - moving operations of the Evaluations/Financial directorships into "General Operations of the House"
3 - moving maintainers and RTPs under "Officers of the House"

this has the benefit of increasing the cohesion of each section, so that each section is more closely related to a single task

@rhochgraf21 rhochgraf21 added the needs discussion describes issues that are ready for discussion at committee meetings label Aug 25, 2023
@rhochgraf21 rhochgraf21 added enhancement New feature or request and removed needs discussion describes issues that are ready for discussion at committee meetings labels Sep 25, 2023
@rhochgraf21 rhochgraf21 self-assigned this Sep 25, 2023
@esoccoli esoccoli added the needs discussion describes issues that are ready for discussion at committee meetings label Oct 31, 2023
@esoccoli
Copy link
Collaborator

esoccoli commented Nov 7, 2023

I have some thoughts about this.

From what we have gotten through so far, it seems like we are going to want to do a bunch of reorganizing of stuff, and I don't think it makes sense to actually move stuff until the end, so I think it would make sense to have a megathread for any organization changes that we might want to make, and then we can go through it at the end, right before we check for spelling/grammar/internal consistency.

Additionally, I was thinking that it would probably be useful to have an outline of what we want the final structure to look like, and update that as we go (which I can deal with), in addition to putting stuff in a megathread. This way, once we get to the point where we are ready to actually do the reorganization, we already have an outline made and we just have to insert content into the proper sections.

@esoccoli
Copy link
Collaborator

Will be addressed with spelling, grammar, and internal consistency (#28 )

@esoccoli esoccoli added duplicate This issue or pull request already exists and removed needs discussion describes issues that are ready for discussion at committee meetings enhancement New feature or request labels Feb 12, 2024
Sam-Cordry pushed a commit that referenced this issue Mar 5, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
duplicate This issue or pull request already exists
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants