Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(batect): Use Zod schema for extract code #33579

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 12, 2025

Conversation

zharinov
Copy link
Collaborator

Changes

Context

Documentation (please check one with an [x])

  • I have updated the documentation, or
  • No documentation update is required

How I've tested my work (please select one)

I have verified these changes via:

  • Code inspection only, or
  • Newly added/modified unit tests, or
  • No unit tests but ran on a real repository, or
  • Both unit tests + ran on a real repository

Copy link
Member

@viceice viceice left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

otherwise LGTM

lib/modules/manager/batect/schema.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@viceice viceice changed the title refactor(batect): Use Zod schema for extract code feat(batect): Use Zod schema for extract code Jan 12, 2025
@viceice
Copy link
Member

viceice commented Jan 12, 2025

we should use feat to force a release, so users can find the version more easily if it causes regressions

@zharinov zharinov requested a review from viceice January 12, 2025 12:15
@viceice viceice added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 12, 2025
Merged via the queue into renovatebot:main with commit 174d6e1 Jan 12, 2025
39 checks passed
@viceice viceice deleted the refactor/batect-use-schema branch January 12, 2025 12:47
@renovate-release
Copy link
Collaborator

🎉 This PR is included in version 39.106.0 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

zharinov added a commit to zharinov/renovate that referenced this pull request Jan 13, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants