Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs(config): remove deprecation date from secrets migration #33125

Merged

Conversation

justo-mend
Copy link
Collaborator

Changes

Removed date of deprecation for encrypted secrets from Migrating Secrets docs page in Mend-hosted Apps section.

Context

Deprecation date has been extended, and hence removed from the Migrating Secrets page.

Documentation (please check one with an [x])

  • I have updated the documentation, or
  • No documentation update is required

How I've tested my work (please select one)

I have verified these changes via:

  • Code inspection only, or
  • Newly added/modified unit tests, or
  • No unit tests but ran on a real repository, or
  • Both unit tests + ran on a real repository

@RahulGautamSingh
Copy link
Collaborator

RahulGautamSingh commented Dec 16, 2024

Please, change the PR title to the below format:
docs(scope): prTitle so something like -> docs(config): remove deprecation date from secrets migration

@rarkins rarkins changed the title Docs/migrating secrets remove date docs(config): remove deprecation date from secrets migration Dec 16, 2024
@rarkins rarkins enabled auto-merge December 16, 2024 05:55
@rarkins rarkins added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 16, 2024
Merged via the queue into renovatebot:main with commit 8453d73 Dec 16, 2024
39 checks passed
@renovate-release
Copy link
Collaborator

🎉 This PR is included in version 39.69.3 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

@justo-mend justo-mend deleted the docs/migrating-secrets-remove-date branch December 16, 2024 08:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants