Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Issue Labelling Bugfixes #159

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 28, 2025
Merged

Issue Labelling Bugfixes #159

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 28, 2025

Conversation

kdvalin
Copy link
Member

@kdvalin kdvalin commented Jan 28, 2025

Description

This PR fixes some errors with the Issue Labeling workflow. For one, it removes the issue_comment debug trigger mistakenly committed. Secondly it fixes a typo in a conditional causing it to never see that a PR has any related issues, causing failure.

Before/After Comparison

Before

Issue Comment Errors

PR Failures

After

Issue comment trigger is removed, so the workflow will not be triggered on issue comments (or PR comments).

The conditional has been updated, causing failure only when it cannot find a parent issue.

Clerical Stuff

Issue: #158
Relates to JIRA: RPOPC-315

@kdvalin kdvalin requested a review from a team January 28, 2025 13:50
Copy link

This relates to RPOPC-315

Copy link
Contributor

@frival frival left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. As discussed on slack, please add the group review label so this can be pushed immediately.

@kdvalin kdvalin added the group_review_lgtm Indicates approval after a group review meeting label Jan 28, 2025
@kdvalin kdvalin merged commit 26fdc26 into main Jan 28, 2025
3 of 6 checks passed
@kdvalin kdvalin deleted the ci/bugfixes branch January 28, 2025 16:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
group_review_lgtm Indicates approval after a group review meeting
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants