Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(e2e): add RHDH upgrade test #2342

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

josephca
Copy link
Collaborator

@josephca josephca commented Feb 7, 2025

Description

Add RHDH upgrade test

Which issue(s) does this PR fix

PR acceptance criteria

Please make sure that the following steps are complete:

  • GitHub Actions are completed and successful
  • Unit Tests are updated and passing
  • E2E Tests are updated and passing
  • Documentation is updated if necessary (requirement for new features)
  • Add a screenshot if the change is UX/UI related

How to test changes / Special notes to the reviewer

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from albarbaro and zdrapela February 7, 2025 23:18
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 7, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please ask for approval from josephca. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@josephca josephca requested review from subhashkhileri and removed request for albarbaro February 7, 2025 23:21
@josephca josephca changed the title chore(e2e): Add RHDH upgrade test chore(e2e): add RHDH upgrade test Feb 10, 2025
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@josephca only for 1.4?

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 10, 2025

@josephca: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-tests e724b6d link true /test e2e-tests

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

echo "Deploying image from repository: ${QUAY_REPO}, TAG_NAME: ${TAG_NAME}, in NAME_SPACE: ${NAME_SPACE}"

helm upgrade -i "${RELEASE_NAME}" -n "${NAME_SPACE}" \
"${HELM_REPO_NAME}/${HELM_IMAGE_NAME}" --version "${CHART_VERSION}" \
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@josephca if it should use latest chart version always then, we can remove "${CHART_VERSION}" so it will always point to latest version.

echo "Deploying image from repository: ${QUAY_REPO_BASE}, TAG_NAME: ${TAG_NAME_BASE}, in NAME_SPACE: ${NAME_SPACE}"

helm upgrade -i "${RELEASE_NAME}" -n "${NAME_SPACE}" \
"${HELM_REPO_NAME}/${HELM_IMAGE_NAME}" --version "${CHART_VERSION}" \
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

-f "${DIR}/value_files/${HELM_CHART_VALUE_FILE_NAME_BASE}" \
--set global.clusterRouterBase="${K8S_CLUSTER_ROUTER_BASE}" \
--set upstream.backstage.image.repository="${QUAY_REPO_BASE}" \
--set upstream.backstage.image.tag="${TAG_NAME_BASE}"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@josephca this TAG_NAME_BASE will come from CI job 🤔

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants