-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 166
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix test for provider server logs #10541
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Elena Bondarenko <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looking good
Signed-off-by: Elena Bondarenko <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Elena Bondarenko <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
@ebondare it would have been good to have an ocs-ci issue associated with the same. Also, since the logs can keep changing, shall we find another way to check the presence, instead of hardcoding the statement of the logs? |
f"{cephclient['metadata']['annotations']['ocs.openshift.io.storageclaim']}-" | ||
f"{cephclient['metadata']['annotations']['ocs.openshift.io.cephusertype']}" | ||
) | ||
except KeyError as err: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we need to have assertion on this I think.
If you don’t want to fail test in the middle and collect results of all checks please follow the test_dashboard_validation_ui
example: save results of this check along with others to the dict and validate in the end of the test
Signed-off-by: Elena Bondarenko <[email protected]>
New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed. |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: ebondare The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
1 similar comment
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: ebondare The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Fixes #10549