Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

webhook: refactor with switch and helpers (#1076) #354

Closed

Conversation

ykaliuta
Copy link

Backport of the upstream patch

Description

How Has This Been Tested?

Screenshot or short clip

Merge criteria

  • You have read the contributors guide.
  • Commit messages are meaningful - have a clear and concise summary and detailed explanation of what was changed and why.
  • Pull Request contains a description of the solution, a link to the JIRA issue, and to any dependent or related Pull Request.
  • Testing instructions have been added in the PR body (for PRs involving changes that are not immediately obvious).
  • The developer has manually tested the changes and verified that the changes work

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 16, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ykaliuta

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Prepare to implement deletion check.

- Use switch to select supported requests, easier to add Delete then.
- Remove misleading messages for the allowed case, the last one only
  is in use.
- Use helpers to count and to compare, there will be the same logic
  for deletion check.
- Tune allowed message.
- Use go style case with several variants instead of C-style.

Signed-off-by: Yauheni Kaliuta <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 97e29c9)
@zdtsw
Copy link

zdtsw commented Sep 18, 2024

included in #357? do we still want this PR

@ykaliuta
Copy link
Author

included in #357? do we still want this PR

not really. Due to squashing policy originally I wanted to submit them one by one. But this one has e2e passed :) so I can rebase #357 if it is accepted.

@ykaliuta ykaliuta closed this Sep 18, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants