Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Question: Hardware Execution Latencies #31

Open
bjin-bdai opened this issue Apr 3, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Question: Hardware Execution Latencies #31

bjin-bdai opened this issue Apr 3, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@bjin-bdai
Copy link

From the associated paper, it seems that hardware latencies can play a big part in the overall performance of the policy. I noticed that in eval_real.py there is a action_exec_latency variable that is used for filtering actions inferenced from the policy. At the same time, there is a separate latency value robot_action_latency, that is used in bimanul_umi_env.py. What is the difference between these two latency values? Should they be the same value?

@Bailey-24
Copy link

hope it can develop UMI2 for easy use and assemble. and it can use "Scaling Up and Distilling Down Language-Guided Robot Skill Acquisition " for language control

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants