Revert "fix: notification memory leak (#361)" #362
Conversation
This reverts commit 6811a31.
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
Walkthrough此次更改涉及 Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #362 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 99.73% 99.73%
=======================================
Files 7 7
Lines 759 759
Branches 124 123 -1
=======================================
Hits 757 757
Misses 2 2 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/NoticeList.tsx (1)
Line range hint
1-185: 总结和后续步骤这次改动主要涉及将
useRef改为useState来跟踪最新的通知，可能是为了解决内存泄漏问题。总的来说，这些更改看起来是一致和合理的。然而，有几个需要注意的地方：
性能影响：这个改动可能会影响组件的重新渲染行为。建议进行性能测试，确保这个改动没有引入新的性能问题。
测试覆盖：有新添加的代码（特别是第 130 行）没有被测试覆盖。建议增加相应的单元测试。
文档和注释：考虑为这些更改添加更多的注释和文档，解释设计决策和实现细节。
后续步骤：
- 进行全面的性能测试，比较更改前后的性能差异。
- 添加缺失的单元测试，提高测试覆盖率。
- 增加代码注释，解释新的实现逻辑。
- 考虑更新组件的文档，说明这次更改的目的和潜在影响。
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 130-130: src/NoticeList.tsx#L130
Added line #L130 was not covered by tests
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- src/NoticeList.tsx (4 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
src/NoticeList.tsx
[warning] 130-130: src/NoticeList.tsx#L130
Added line #L130 was not covered by tests
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/NoticeList.tsx (3)
75-75: 更新最新通知的方法变更看起来不错使用
setLatestNotice来更新最新的通知是个好做法，它确保了 React 能够正确地追踪这个变化。建议：
考虑在这里添加一个简短的注释，解释为什么要使用useState而不是useRef。这将有助于其他开发者理解这个设计决策。
118-118: stackStyle 计算的变更看起来正确，但需要增加测试覆盖这些更改与之前将
useRef改为useState的变动保持一致，看起来是正确的实现。然而，静态分析工具指出第 130 行没有被测试覆盖到。建议：
- 为这个新的计算逻辑添加单元测试，确保在不同情况下（例如，不同的
latestNotice和dictRef.current[strKey]值）都能正确计算scaleX。- 考虑添加注释解释这个计算的目的和工作原理，特别是
scaleX的计算逻辑。#!/bin/bash # 描述：检查是否存在与此组件相关的测试文件 # 测试：搜索可能的测试文件。预期：找到 NoticeList 的测试文件。 fd -e test.tsx -e test.ts -e spec.tsx -e spec.ts . src/ | rg 'NoticeList'Also applies to: 129-130
49-49: 请解释更改状态管理方法的原因将
useRef更改为useState可能会影响组件的重新渲染行为。这种变化可能解决了内存泄漏问题，但也可能引入新的性能考虑。能否提供更多关于这次更改的背景信息？特别是：
- 这个改动是如何解决内存泄漏问题的？
- 是否考虑过这种改变对组件性能的潜在影响？
- 有没有进行过性能测试来验证这个改动的效果？
This reverts commit 6811a31.
Summary by CodeRabbit