Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: compatible with alt and altGr #281

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 14, 2024
Merged

Conversation

Jarryxin
Copy link
Contributor

@Jarryxin Jarryxin commented Sep 14, 2024

ant-design/ant-design#50795 (comment)

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • 功能改进
    • 优化了InternalMentions组件中的按键事件处理逻辑,提高了对'Alt'键的检测精度。

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 14, 2024

Walkthrough

此次更改涉及 src/Mentions.tsx 文件中 InternalMentions 组件的条件逻辑。具体来说,更新了对 'Alt' 键的检查方式,从字符串比较改为使用特定的键码 KeyCode.ALT。此修改旨在提高键盘事件处理的精确性,以确保逻辑能够正确响应实际的键码。

Changes

文件 更改摘要
src/Mentions.tsx 更新 InternalMentions 组件中对 'Alt' 键的检查逻辑,改为使用 KeyCode.ALT 进行键码检测。

Possibly related PRs

Poem

在草丛中跳跃的小兔子,
键盘上舞动着新逻辑,
'Alt' 键不再模糊,
精准如箭,直击目标,
代码更新,欢声笑语,
让我们一起庆祝这变化! 🐇✨

Tip

OpenAI O1 model for chat
  • We have deployed OpenAI's latest O1 model for chat.
  • OpenAI claims that this model has superior reasoning capabilities than their GPT-4o model.
  • Please share any feedback with us in the discussions post.

Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between cd1e87f and dfef25a.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/Mentions.tsx (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
src/Mentions.tsx (1)

397-397: 修改看起来不错!

将 'Alt' 字符串检查替换为 KeyCode.ALT 键码检查,可以提高键检测机制的精确性,确保逻辑正确响应实际的键码,而不是依赖字符串比较。这种调整可以提高键处理功能的健壮性,特别是在首选键码以保持一致性和性能的场景中。


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 14, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 98.37%. Comparing base (cd1e87f) to head (dfef25a).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #281   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   98.37%   98.37%           
=======================================
  Files           7        7           
  Lines         246      246           
  Branches       58       57    -1     
=======================================
  Hits          242      242           
  Misses          4        4           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@afc163 afc163 merged commit 76cf919 into react-component:master Sep 14, 2024
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants