Suggested antenna balance tweaks #69
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
EC/Mit value was much higher compared to other antennas. - EC/s: 68.57 -> 17.14 - Mit/s: 2.86 -> 2.86 - EC/Mit: 24.00 -> 6.00
EC/Mit value was much higher compared to other antennas. Mass was low compared to stock RA-2. - EC/s: 68.57 -> 17.14 - Mit/s: 2.86 -> 2.86 - EC/Mit: 24.00 -> 6.00 - Mass: 0.1 -> 0.2
Efficiency (EC/Mit) was too good. Slowed down speed a bit since these are probe cores and not dedicated antennas. - EC/s: 10.00 -> 10.00 - Mit/s: 3.67 -> 1.80 - EC/Mit: 2.73 -> 5.56
|
I'm still testing. I'd like to keep the integrated landers efficient as these are supposed to be one-shot missions. I want to make sure the antenna can transmit all the data from the landing |
|
My advice is from the point of view that as you move away from the standard 6 EC/Mit transmit cost, you move away a LEGO-like approach where players can use your parts easily in combination with parts from other mods. For the CA-L1200, you may want to just bump up the amount of EC on the two probe cores by 2.5x. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I've been doing antenna comparisons and found a few outliers. These are the values without RemoteTech installed.
CA-A100 Small Dish Antenna
EC/Mit value was much higher compared to other antennas.
CAE-102 Vorona Dish Antenna
EC/Mit value was much higher compared to other antennas. Mass was low compared to stock RA-2.
CA-L1200 'Draco' / CAE-L165 'Fomalhaut' probes
Efficiency (EC/Mit) was too good. Slowed down speed a bit since these are probe cores and not dedicated antennas.
Original values compared against the other Coatl's:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1yj08CJX458ZbHOsLgVckEtqvHUj5KkP1En-R1kLIYyw/edit#gid=1416012780