Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Skip rf_memleak tests #5529

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 28, 2023
Merged

Skip rf_memleak tests #5529

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
8 changes: 8 additions & 0 deletions python/cuml/tests/test_random_forest.py
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1156,6 +1156,10 @@ def predict_with_json_rf_regressor(rf, x):
np.testing.assert_almost_equal(pred, expected_pred, decimal=6)


@pytest.mark.xfail(
reason="Needs refactoring/debugging due to sporadic failures"
"https://github.com/rapidsai/cuml/issues/5528"
)
@pytest.mark.memleak
@pytest.mark.parametrize("estimator_type", ["classification"])
def test_rf_host_memory_leak(large_clf, estimator_type):
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1196,6 +1200,10 @@ def test_rf_host_memory_leak(large_clf, estimator_type):
assert (final_mem - initial_baseline_mem) < 2.4e6


@pytest.mark.xfail(
reason="Needs refactoring/debugging due to sporadic failures"
"https://github.com/rapidsai/cuml/issues/5528"
)
@pytest.mark.memleak
@pytest.mark.parametrize("estimator_type", ["regression", "classification"])
@pytest.mark.parametrize("i", list(range(100)))
Expand Down