Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use conda-build instead of conda-mambabuild #18092

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 25, 2025

Conversation

bdice
Copy link
Contributor

@bdice bdice commented Feb 25, 2025

This changes from conda mambabuild to conda build. Conda now uses the mamba solver so no performance regressions are expected.

This is a temporary change as we plan to migrate to rattler-build in the near future. However, this is needed sooner to drop boa and unblock Python 3.13 migrations.

xref: rapidsai/build-planning#149

@bdice bdice requested a review from a team as a code owner February 25, 2025 20:16
@bdice bdice requested a review from AyodeAwe February 25, 2025 20:16
@bdice bdice added non-breaking Non-breaking change improvement Improvement / enhancement to an existing function labels Feb 25, 2025
@jameslamb jameslamb requested review from jameslamb and removed request for AyodeAwe February 25, 2025 20:49
@bdice
Copy link
Contributor Author

bdice commented Feb 25, 2025

/merge

@rapids-bot rapids-bot bot merged commit 54c15b2 into rapidsai:branch-25.04 Feb 25, 2025
112 of 113 checks passed
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ rapids-logger "Begin cpp build"
sccache --zero-stats

# With boa installed conda build forward to boa
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Think we want to drop comments like these as well

A few more appear below

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
improvement Improvement / enhancement to an existing function non-breaking Non-breaking change
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants