Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): update dependency typescript-eslint to ~8.15.0 #79

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 19, 2024

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Nov 18, 2024

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
typescript-eslint (source) ~8.14.0 -> ~8.15.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (typescript-eslint)

v8.15.0

Compare Source

🚀 Features
  • typescript-eslint: allow infinitely deep array nesting in config function and extends (#​10333)
  • eslint-plugin: new rule no-unsafe-type-assertion (#​10051)
  • eslint-plugin: added related-getter-setter-pairs rule (#​10192)
🩹 Fixes
  • add missing peer dependencies (#​9744)
❤️ Thank You

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@rafaelurben rafaelurben merged commit 95b1e6f into main Nov 19, 2024
10 of 12 checks passed
@rafaelurben rafaelurben deleted the renovate/typescript-eslint-monorepo branch November 19, 2024 15:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant