Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update cargo.toml lookup #207

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 2, 2024
Merged

Update cargo.toml lookup #207

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 2, 2024

Conversation

micbakos-rdx
Copy link
Contributor

Update gradle script to look into the correct Cargo.toml file to resolve sargon's version

Copy link
Contributor

@CyonAlexRDX CyonAlexRDX left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 2, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 97.4%. Comparing base (dda428b) to head (b7510e5).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@          Coverage Diff          @@
##            main    #207   +/-   ##
=====================================
  Coverage   97.4%   97.4%           
=====================================
  Files        925     925           
  Lines      14828   14828           
  Branches      64      64           
=====================================
  Hits       14447   14447           
  Misses       374     374           
  Partials       7       7           
Flag Coverage Δ
rust 96.9% <ø> (ø)
swift 99.3% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

@micbakos-rdx micbakos-rdx merged commit af1bd78 into main Sep 2, 2024
9 of 10 checks passed
@micbakos-rdx micbakos-rdx deleted the fix/sargon-version branch September 2, 2024 09:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Kotlin 🤖 Changes in Kotlin Sargon
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants