You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We do have security-related stuff to worry about: #77, #80, #81. But we realistically can't prevent every scenario. Would be good to grab something off the shelf which sets appropriate expectations and protects us. The no-warranty clause in the MIT license helps, but we might want something a bit stronger.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Looking at the policies we have, I think we can also do with a General Terms of Use document. This should re-state very prominently the no-warranty basis of the contributed packages, as well as disclaimers for the repository itself. Probably need to add other legal language.
I can start to put something together and make it available as a PR for comment.
In the meantime, do post here anything that could be a good precedent.
Should we expand the terms of use to include Contributors, package maintainers, and our current code of conduct? As I mentioned, https://docs.github.com/en/site-policy/acceptable-use-policies covers scenarios that we should explicitly anticipate and forbid.
We do have security-related stuff to worry about: #77, #80, #81. But we realistically can't prevent every scenario. Would be good to grab something off the shelf which sets appropriate expectations and protects us. The no-warranty clause in the MIT license helps, but we might want something a bit stronger.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: