-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Making pr #235
Conversation
…ate a pull request when done. Still need to do a lot of work, but we are getting there.
This is wonderful progress, great work. Eventually, I think the hope would be for branch selection to be a dropdown, with a |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Excellent progress
|
||
pub async fn list_branches_handler( | ||
State(state): State<AppState>, | ||
) -> Result<(StatusCode, Json<serde_json::Value>), (StatusCode, Json<serde_json::Value>)> { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Same as the other one, a more strongly typed json plz
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you explain more what you mean by a more strongly typed json?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just using a struct that implements serialize/de serialize, rather than a serde_json::Value
. Again, it's fine if you would prefer to just switch it to a serde_json::Object
, but at that point I'd ask that you explain what exactly it returns in the function docstring.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code review is complete, refer to discord for UI review
Yes please, just a single github route creator
…On Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 20:08 TheKrol ***@***.***> wrote:
***@***.**** commented on this pull request.
------------------------------
On backend/src/handlers_prelude/github_list_branches.rs
<#235 (comment)>:
I'm okay with that, should I put the routes in with them?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#235 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ASCMLYSGYCWHK3DZTXV3YTLZ4G5KNAVCNFSM6AAAAABP5ZEWBWVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43YUDVNRWFEZLROVSXG5CSMV3GSZLXHMZDGNZZGE4DCMZUGQ>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
No description provided.