Upgrade qblox-instruments dependency

[hay-k]

As a side effect of investigating #845 I had to upgrade the firmware on the instruments in our lab, which in turn means updating the qblox-instruments dependency. This PR contains only changes related to this upgrade.

P.S. This upgrade does not fix the issue. The fix is expected to come with another firmware upgrade in future.

Checklist:

• Reviewers confirm new code works as expected.
• Tests are passing.
• Coverage does not decrease.
• Documentation is updated.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 65.21739% with 8 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 66.59%. Comparing base (3144c1d) to head (62a816b).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Files	Patch %	Lines
src/qibolab/instruments/qblox/cluster_qrm_rf.py	55.55%	4 Missing ⚠️
src/qibolab/instruments/qblox/cluster_qcm_bb.py	71.42%	2 Missing ⚠️
src/qibolab/instruments/qblox/cluster_qcm_rf.py	71.42%	2 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #859      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   66.57%   66.59%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          55       55              
  Lines        5939     5942       +3     
==========================================
+ Hits         3954     3957       +3     
  Misses       1985     1985              

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	66.59% <65.21%> (+0.01%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[stavros11]

Thanks @hay-k.

Regarding the QPU tests, I think there is something wrong with the label workflow. If you run them manually

srun -p spinq10q pytest -m qpu --platform spinq10q --no-cov

they are passing, except one failure related to a transpiler/compiler issue, which I caused and is unrelated to this PR.