Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for confounding variables #877

Draft
wants to merge 27 commits into
base: development
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

KochTobi
Copy link
Member

Addresses #642

@KochTobi
Copy link
Member Author

As confounding variables are valid for all samples in an experiment (including samples where a value might not yet been known), I decided to go for including empty variables in the samples.

@KochTobi KochTobi linked an issue Nov 4, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
> The Spring team recommends that you annotate methods of concrete classes with the @transactional annotation, rather than relying on annotated methods in interfaces, even if the latter does work for interface-based and target-class proxies as of 5.0.
https://docs.spring.io/spring-framework/reference/data-access/transaction/declarative/annotations.html
…etadata-to-add-confounding-variables

# Conflicts:
#	user-interface/src/main/bundles/dev.bundle
…etadata-to-add-confounding-variables

# Conflicts:
#	user-interface/src/main/bundles/dev.bundle
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Editing registered metadata to add confounding variables
1 participant