Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Table of Contents to README.md #564

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Aug 6, 2024
Merged

Conversation

dylanpulver
Copy link
Collaborator

@dylanpulver dylanpulver commented Aug 6, 2024

Summary
This pull request adds a Table of Contents (TOC) section to the README.md file for the Safety CLI project. The TOC improves the readability and navigation of the documentation by providing quick links to various sections within the README.

Changes

  • Added a "Table of Contents" section after the badges.
  • Updated the README.md file to include links to:
    • Introduction
    • Key Features
    • Getting Started
      • GitHub Action
      • Command Line Interface
        • Installation
        • Log In or Register
        • Running Your First Scan
      • Basic Commands
    • Detailed Documentation
      • Safety CLI 3
      • Vulnerability Remediation
      • Integration
      • Administration
      • Output
      • Miscellaneous
    • License
    • Supported Python Versions
    • Resources

Motivation
The addition of a TOC helps users to easily navigate through the comprehensive information provided in the README. It enhances user experience by making it simpler to find relevant sections quickly.
Checklist

  • Added a Table of Contents section to README.md.
  • Verified the links to each section within the README.md.
  • Ensured that the structure and headings of the README.md remain consistent and clear.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Introduced a structured "Table of Contents" in the README for improved navigation.
    • Enhanced organization of the "Getting Started" section with clearly defined subsections.
    • Made minor formatting adjustments for better readability and consistency.
    • Added hyperlinks for better accessibility within the document.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 6, 2024

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@dylanpulver has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 14 minutes and 13 seconds before requesting another review.

How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2f1f913 and c23325a.

Walkthrough

The recent changes to the README.md significantly enhance its organization and readability. A new "Table of Contents" has been added to facilitate navigation, allowing users to easily find sections such as "Introduction," "Key Features," and "Getting Started." Minor formatting adjustments have also been made to improve the document's overall presentation, ensuring a clearer and more user-friendly experience.

Changes

Files Change Summary
README.md Added "Table of Contents" for easier navigation. Improved formatting for clarity and consistency.

Poem

In the garden of code, where changes bloom,
A table of contents dispels any gloom.
With neat little links, the users can roam,
Finding their way in this digital home.
Hooray for the tweaks, let clarity ring,
Here’s to a README that makes our hearts sing! 🐰✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between adc0e6a and 931d2fe.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (3 hunks)
Additional context used
Markdownlint
README.md

79-79: null
Bare URL used

(MD034, no-bare-urls)


125-125: null
Bare URL used

(MD034, no-bare-urls)


132-132: null
Bare URL used

(MD034, no-bare-urls)


132-132: null
Bare URL used

(MD034, no-bare-urls)

Additional comments not posted (2)
README.md (2)

Line range hint 28-135:
LGTM!

The remaining sections are consistent and readable. No issues found.

Tools
Markdownlint

123-123: null
Bare URL used

(MD034, no-bare-urls)


125-125: null
Bare URL used

(MD034, no-bare-urls)


132-132: null
Bare URL used

(MD034, no-bare-urls)


132-132: null
Bare URL used

(MD034, no-bare-urls)


137-137: null
Bare URL used

(MD034, no-bare-urls)


13-27: Verify the correctness of TOC links.

Ensure that each link in the Table of Contents points to the correct section within the document.

Verification successful

The Table of Contents (TOC) links are correct and point to the appropriate sections within the README.md file.

  • The TOC section is correctly formatted and functional.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the correctness of TOC links.

# Test: Check each link in the TOC. Expect: Each link should point to the correct section.
rg --type markdown -A 1 $'(#table-of-contents|#introduction|#key-features|#getting-started|#github-action|#command-line-interface|#1-installation|#2-log-in-or-register|#3-running-your-first-scan|#basic-commands|#detailed-documentation|#license|#supported-python-versions|#resources)'

Length of output: 1022


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence of section headers in the README.md file to ensure TOC links are correct.

# List of section headers to verify
headers=(
  "# Table of Contents"
  "# Introduction"
  "# Key Features"
  "# Getting Started"
  "## GitHub Action"
  "## Command Line Interface"
  "### 1. Installation"
  "### 2. Log In or Register"
  "### 3. Running Your First Scan"
  "## Basic Commands"
  "# Detailed Documentation"
  "# License"
  "# Supported Python Versions"
  "# Resources"
)

# Check each header in the README.md file
for header in "${headers[@]}"; do
  echo "Searching for header: $header"
  rg --type markdown -N "$header" README.md
done

Length of output: 3138

README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

@davidlacho davidlacho left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💅

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 931d2fe and 2f1f913.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (3 hunks)
Additional context used
Markdownlint
README.md

125-125: null
Bare URL used

(MD034, no-bare-urls)


132-132: null
Bare URL used

(MD034, no-bare-urls)

Additional comments not posted (5)
README.md (5)

79-79: LGTM!

The conversion of the bare URL to a markdown link is correctly formatted and functional.


123-123: LGTM!

The conversion of the bare URL to a markdown link is correctly formatted and functional.


125-125: LGTM!

The email address is correctly formatted.

Tools
Markdownlint

125-125: null
Bare URL used

(MD034, no-bare-urls)


132-132: LGTM!

The conversion of the bare URL to a markdown link is correctly formatted and functional.

Tools
Markdownlint

132-132: null
Bare URL used

(MD034, no-bare-urls)


13-27: LGTM! Verify the links in the Table of Contents.

The Table of Contents (TOC) is well-structured and enhances navigation. Ensure all links are accurate and functional.

Verification successful

Verified: The links in the Table of Contents are accurate and functional.

The headers in the README.md match the links in the Table of Contents, confirming their accuracy.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all links in the Table of Contents are accurate and functional.

# Test: Check the presence of headers in the README.md. Expect: Headers should match the TOC links.
rg --type markdown -A 0 $'##? '

Length of output: 4115

@dylanpulver dylanpulver merged commit b897714 into main Aug 6, 2024
12 checks passed
@dylanpulver dylanpulver deleted the readme/table-of-contents branch August 6, 2024 15:42
@dylanpulver dylanpulver mentioned this pull request Aug 9, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants