Skip to content

gh-131798: JIT: Optimize _CALL_LEN when the length is known #135260

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jun 20, 2025

Conversation

tomasr8
Copy link
Member

@tomasr8 tomasr8 commented Jun 8, 2025

This uses the same principle as #135194 to completely remove _CALL_LEN when the length is known.

I don't know how common it is to actually know the length exactly so please let me know if this is not worth it, but given that _CALL_LEN is the most common builtin call, it felt worth to optimize this case.

Comment on lines +1195 to +1207
int tuple_length = sym_tuple_length(arg);
if (tuple_length >= 0) {
PyObject *temp = PyLong_FromLong(tuple_length);
if (temp == NULL) {
goto error;
}
if (_Py_IsImmortal(temp)) {
REPLACE_OP(this_instr, _POP_CALL_ONE_LOAD_CONST_INLINE_BORROW,
0, (uintptr_t)temp);
}
res = sym_new_const(ctx, temp);
Py_DECREF(temp);
}
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is basically copied from the recent _GET_LEN optimization

@tomasr8 tomasr8 requested a review from brandtbucher June 8, 2025 15:44
Copy link
Member

@brandtbucher brandtbucher left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good! I'll leave this for you to merge yourself. ;)

@tomasr8
Copy link
Member Author

tomasr8 commented Jun 20, 2025

I'm planning to merge this once the tests pass :)

@tomasr8 tomasr8 merged commit 61532b4 into python:main Jun 20, 2025
55 checks passed
@tomasr8 tomasr8 deleted the jit-call-len-known-length branch June 20, 2025 16:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants