Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
moar asyncio support, test infra improvements #213
moar asyncio support, test infra improvements #213
Changes from 1 commit
a57b82b
f6b82f3
5297f4b
30f969d
63894e0
28c9bc1
942cc12
00b637d
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
educated guesses from reading asyncio docs:
https://docs.python.org/3/library/asyncio-dev.html#asyncio-multithreading
https://docs.python.org/3/library/asyncio-subprocess.html
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nurseries only exist in trio. Could expand the check to work with anyio taskgroups though
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let's leave that for a future PR, but yes - it'd be great for the ecosystem to support this for
anyio.TaskGroup
, and at that point we might as well supportasyncio.TaskGroup
too.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
See above for a future PR; there is
asyncio.TaskGroup
.I also suspect that
async with timeout()
is doing something similar? But at this point users really just have to switch to structured concurrency if they want sane error handling.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh right right,
trio.[move_on/fail]_[after/at]
are just wrapper functions for cancelscopes.It might still be good (and fairly easy) to raise errors for an asyncio user doing it, even if our real suggestion is for them to switch to anyio.
Secret plan is for asyncio users to start running our checks, then when getting tons of useful errors realize they should switch to anyio 😈
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Plausibly, yeah.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We should support
anyio
for this though, open an issue?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This one, as opposed to 101, 111, and 112 is supported. Updated comment to refer to
async113.py
which tests anyio functionality.