Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding -e flag to editable local references #258

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 30, 2024

Conversation

fredsensibill
Copy link
Contributor

@fredsensibill fredsensibill commented Feb 17, 2024

Resolves #145

Specifically, it takes the approach suggested by @bow.

I would love some feedback from one of the maintainers. The issue has been open for quite some time, and I'm not entirely sure if this would be a desired behaviour.

Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Feb 17, 2024

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarCloud

Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Apr 30, 2024

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarCloud

@jbsilva
Copy link

jbsilva commented Jun 11, 2024

My use case depended on the old behavior, so I simply removed the -e with sed: poetry export -f requirements.txt --without-hashes | sed -E 's/^-e[[:space:]]+//' > requirements.txt".
I hope this helps others.

@nickroberts
Copy link

nickroberts commented Jun 27, 2024

It looks like this might be why my issue showed up. Thanks for the info, @jbsilva.

I'm still not sure if this is the desired outcome, however. How would use use pip to install these requirements correctly?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Poetry export does not export local editable requirements correctly
5 participants