Skip to content

fix LaTeX dot in diversification ratio formula #1788

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

saishreyakumar
Copy link

@saishreyakumar saishreyakumar commented Jun 19, 2025

Description

Replaced \cdot with . in the LaTeX formula for the diversification ratio in the docstring to fix the rendering issue.

Related Issue

Checklist


📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://pymc-marketing--1788.org.readthedocs.build/en/1788/

@github-actions github-actions bot added MMM docs Improvements or additions to documentation good first issue Good for newcomers . Doesn't require extensive knowledge of the repo and package labels Jun 19, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 19, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 91.84%. Comparing base (a97c4db) to head (730fc65).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1788   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.84%   91.84%           
=======================================
  Files          60       60           
  Lines        6819     6819           
=======================================
  Hits         6263     6263           
  Misses        556      556           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@williambdean
Copy link
Contributor

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
docs Improvements or additions to documentation good first issue Good for newcomers . Doesn't require extensive knowledge of the repo and package MMM
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Poor rendering of latex documentation
2 participants