Skip to content

Releases: psychoinformatics-de/remodnav

Increase precision in output

05 May 09:28
v.1.1.2
Compare
Choose a tag to compare

This release contains a feature request from #47: it increases the precision of reported x and y start and end points to 5 decimal points.

Even more safeguards

01 Dec 11:07
v1.1.1
Compare
Choose a tag to compare

Includes #36 - a safeguard against events without any valid velocity values.

Maintenance release

26 Nov 08:22
v1.1
Compare
Choose a tag to compare

What's Changed

  • Specified expected CSV-format in README.md by @jliebers in #16
  • BF: prevent conversion of lower y-axis limit to -inf by @adswa in #15
  • BF-19: Safeguard inappropriate savgol filter set up by @adswa in #20
  • BF: Loosen savgol-filter warning to allow disabling the filter by @adswa in #22
  • Switch to appveyor w/ cross-platform tests by @mih in #21
  • Fix CIs by @adswa in #32
  • Improve input validation by @adswa in #29

New Contributors

Full Changelog: 1.0...v1.1

Submission time

25 Apr 12:55
@mih mih
1.0
Compare
Choose a tag to compare
  • Improve program help

Go publish

23 Apr 06:43
@mih mih
0.2
Compare
Choose a tag to compare
  • Ability to distinguish any number of fixation and pursuit events within
    a single inter-saccade-period
  • No longer use a maximum amplitude parameter to distinguish pursuits from
    fixations, but use a single velocity threshold instead. The threshold
    is evaluated against a heavily low-pass filtered gaze trajectory, to
    only reflect "smooth" eye movement components (and thereby suppress the
    impact of measurement noise).
  • New parameter noise_factor that influences the adaptive saccade velocity
    threshold. The saccade onset velocity threshold is the median of all
    sub-threshold velocities plus noise_factor times the MAD of these
    velocities. The saccade peak velocity threshold is computed in the same
    fashion, but uses 2x noise_factor. The default value should work for
    noisy data. Reducing this factor can boost saccade detection sensitivity
    for clean data (e.g. Nyström et al., 2010 use the equivalent of a factor
    of 3.0)

New beginnings

10 Sep 11:32
@mih mih
0.1
Compare
Choose a tag to compare
0.1

Release 0.1