refactor(stats): Use Finding instead of Check_Report

[jfagoagas]

Description

Refactor extract_findings_statistics to use Finding instead of Check_Report_XXX.

Checklist

• Are there new checks included in this PR? Yes / No
  • If so, do we need to update permissions for the provider? Please review this carefully.
• Review if the code is being covered by tests.
• Review if code is being documented following this specification https://github.com/google/styleguide/blob/gh-pages/pyguide.md#38-comments-and-docstrings
• Review if backport is needed.
• Review if is needed to change the Readme.md

API

• Verify if API specs need to be regenerated.
• Check if version updates are required (e.g., specs, Poetry, etc.).
• Ensure new entries are added to CHANGELOG.md, if applicable.

License

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 80.55556% with 7 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 88.79%. Comparing base (c452820) to head (72e3ab9).
Report is 17 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #7053      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   88.72%   88.79%   +0.07%     
==========================================
  Files        1200     1207       +7     
  Lines       34832    35042     +210     
==========================================
+ Hits        30903    31117     +214     
+ Misses       3929     3925       -4     

Flag	Coverage Δ
prowler	88.79% <80.55%> (+0.07%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components	Coverage Δ
prowler	88.79% <80.55%> (+0.07%)	⬆️
api	∅ <ø> (∅)

[pedrooot]

Thanks for fixing this bug! 🔝

[pedrooot]

Thanks for fixing this bug! 🔝

[MrCloudSec]

👏🏼 👏🏼 👏🏼 👏🏼