Skip to content

Boundaries admin level 3 5 #202

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 5, 2024
Merged

Boundaries admin level 3 5 #202

merged 4 commits into from
Jan 5, 2024

Conversation

bdon
Copy link
Member

@bdon bdon commented Jan 5, 2024

See #189 for screenshots

Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Jan 5, 2024

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

The SonarCloud Quality Gate passed, but some issues were introduced.

3 New issues
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
100.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

@bdon bdon merged commit 9ef89ab into main Jan 5, 2024
@bdon bdon deleted the boundaries-admin-level-3-5 branch January 5, 2024 14:12
@@ -199,6 +199,13 @@ public void processFeature(SourceFeature sf, FeatureCollector features) {
// Natural Earth is used for low zooms (for compilation and tile size reasons)
themeMinZoom = 6;
}
// used in Colombia, Brazil, Kenya (historical)
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Beware: In Brazil there are several "statistical" groupings of actual administrative regions. Some of these are in conventional usage, some are not. I'm also wary of adding historical boundary lines. However, since the map looks broken without this change we should make it... but worth some more research...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants