Issue 264: Migrating changes from fqm-execution related to LocalId i…

[gregory-akins]

…ssues which stemmed from BONNIEMAT 1850 ticket & associated CQFramework changes

Pull requests into cqm-execution require the following. Submitter and reviewer should ✅ when done. For items that are not-applicable, note it's not-applicable ("N/A") and ✅.

Submitter:

• This pull request describes why these changes were made.
• Internal ticket for this PR:
• Internal ticket links to this PR
• Code diff has been done and been reviewed
• Tests are included and test edge cases
• Tests have been run locally and pass

Reviewer 1:

Name:

• Code is maintainable and reusable, reuses existing code and infrastructure where appropriate, and accomplishes the task’s purpose
• The tests appropriately test the new code, including edge cases
• You have tried to break the code

Reviewer 2:

Name:

• Code is maintainable and reusable, reuses existing code and infrastructure where appropriate, and accomplishes the task’s purpose
• The tests appropriately test the new code, including edge cases
• You have tried to break the code

[dczulada]

@gregory-akins Will this likely be tagged as a 4.2.0 version.

[gregory-akins]

@gregory-akins Will this likely be tagged as a 4.2.0 version.

I think that will be up to Mitre