Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ProceduralParts consistent to stock tanks in mass and methane support. #120

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 23, 2021

Conversation

tomasbrod
Copy link
Contributor

The LFO is left untouched, but appears to be consistent to stock tanks. MethaOxi was added. MethaOxi and HydroOxi were made consistent with the insulated cryo tanks in both dry mass and cost.

@tomasbrod
Copy link
Contributor Author

Issue hemeac/kiwiTechTree#94 is related.

@tomasbrod
Copy link
Contributor Author

Appears that SMURFF breaks a bit more with this, than it was broken without on Procparts.

@ChrisAdderley ChrisAdderley changed the base branch from master to dev July 21, 2021 20:31
@ChrisAdderley
Copy link
Collaborator

Is that an issue, or can I merge this?

@tomasbrod
Copy link
Contributor Author

I was struggling to make this work with SMURFF, but only way I managed was to rename the TANK_TYPE_OPTION and rewrite the smurff-like patch. That will probably break crafts, but considering the mass ratio was broken before, probably none was using it. On the upside, the label now fits the UI. Maybe add another patch to rename it back?

@ChrisAdderley
Copy link
Collaborator

I personally don't really know what to do there. I'm going to say it's your call :). Let me know when it's ready and i'll merge it in and it'll be in next version.

@tomasbrod
Copy link
Contributor Author

With this patch, it is as good as it gets.

@ChrisAdderley ChrisAdderley merged commit 49febc2 into post-kerbin-mining-corporation:dev Jul 23, 2021
@ChrisAdderley
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants