-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: Correct wildcard expansion for functions #19449
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #19449 +/- ##
===========================================
+ Coverage 60.05% 79.94% +19.89%
===========================================
Files 1533 1534 +1
Lines 210940 211049 +109
Branches 2442 2444 +2
===========================================
+ Hits 126680 168732 +42052
+ Misses 83706 41762 -41944
- Partials 554 555 +1 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Thanks, can you add some tests on the python side? |
@ritchie46 Please check now. |
Thanks! |
Thank you @siddharth-vi I'm not sure if it's something you want to look into, but I think there were also some other cases where this seems to happen.
The corresponding |
Will check them out @cmdlineluser |
Fixes #19007
Fixes #18968
Remove INPUT_WILDCARD_EXPANSION for the following functions -
INPUT_WILDCARD_EXPANSION is meant for functions which can have variadic arguments. The above functions have fixed number of arguments, hence this flag should not be set.
Behaviour -
Before
After
More discussion about this can be found in the issue #19007