br: ks3 domain mode

[Leavrth]

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #53775

Problem Summary:
introduce domain mode for ks3 sdk

What changed and how does it work?

for ks3 server,

1. path//file and path/file are different places.
2. return http status code 404 if file does not exist.
3. use ks3 sdk in default if the endpoint contains ksyuncs.com.

Check List

Tests

• Unit test
• Integration test
• Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
• No need to test

  • I checked and no code files have been changed.

Side effects

• Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
• Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
• Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

• Affects user behaviors
• Contains syntax changes
• Contains variable changes
• Contains experimental features
• Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

None

[tiprow]

Hi @Leavrth. Thanks for your PR.

PRs from untrusted users cannot be marked as trusted with /ok-to-test in this repo meaning untrusted PR authors can never trigger tests themselves. Collaborators can still trigger tests on the PR using /test all.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 22 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 74.4216%. Comparing base (5ed9e63) to head (07a5752).

Additional details and impacted files

@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##             master     #53790        +/-   ##
================================================
+ Coverage   73.0395%   74.4216%   +1.3820%     
================================================
  Files          1684       1730        +46     
  Lines        465705     473818      +8113     
================================================
+ Hits         340149     352623     +12474     
+ Misses       104636      98795      -5841     
- Partials      20920      22400      +1480     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integration	46.7987% <0.0000%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components	Coverage Δ
dumpling	52.6910% <ø> (ø)
parser	∅ <ø> (∅)
br	61.0143% <0.0000%> (+15.7046%)	⬆️

[lance6716]

rest lgtm

[lance6716]

/lgtm

[ti-chi-bot]

[LGTM Timeline notifier]

Timeline:

• 2024-06-04 10:06:49.5910604 +0000 UTC m=+3375763.348195968: ☑️ agreed by lance6716.

[ti-chi-bot]

@lance6716: Your lgtm message is repeated, so it is ignored.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[ti-chi-bot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: lance6716

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• br/pkg/storage/OWNERS [lance6716]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[ti-chi-bot]

@Leavrth: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name	Commit	Details	Required	Rerun command
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/unit-test	07a5752	link	true	/test unit-test
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/check_dev_2	07a5752	link	true	/test check-dev2

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.