FIX: Question marks are not parsed correctly #146
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
According to my understanding of the EDIFACT standard, a single
?
before a special character (e.g.,+
,:
,'
) releases the character, meaning it no longer serves its usual role. Here’s a breakdown:?'
means the apostrophe is released and does not close the segment.??
means the question mark itself is released as a literal character.???
results in?
(released) followed by?'
(apostrophe released).????
results in two released question marks (??
) with no special meaning, so an apostrophe following them acts as a segment terminator.The parser has been updated to correctly interpret these cases, ensuring segment terminators behave as expected based on the parity of preceding question marks.
Changes
terminatorRegex
in the parser