Refactored and renamed classes and methods for budgets #48
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…refactor start method
DurieuxPol
changed the title
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 7223118904
💛 - Coveralls |
DurieuxPol
changed the title
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #41, fixes #42, fixes #43
Moved the empty code for
startmethod of budgets in the superclass, with comments.Rename all budgets classes to
MTBudget. I could rename simply toBudget, but I kept the "MT" prefix to specify that those budgets are for mutation testing, and to avoid confusion in case there are other budgets from other projects, or in the future.Renamed
check: with:toexceedBudgetOn:considering:to be more intention revealing. Added comments as well.