Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closes #2584 country_code_lookup moved to data #2614

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Dec 23, 2024

Conversation

jeffreyad
Copy link
Collaborator

@jeffreyad jeffreyad commented Dec 18, 2024

Thank you for your Pull Request! We have developed this task checklist from the Development Process Guide to help with the final steps of the process. Completing the below tasks helps to ensure our reviewers can maximize their time on your code as well as making sure the admiral codebase remains robust and consistent.

Please check off each taskbox as an acknowledgment that you completed the task or check off that it is not relevant to your Pull Request. This checklist is part of the Github Action workflows and the Pull Request will not be merged into the main branch until you have checked off each task.

  • Place Closes #<insert_issue_number> into the beginning of your Pull Request Title (Use Edit button in top-right if you need to update)
  • Code is formatted according to the tidyverse style guide. Run styler::style_file() to style R and Rmd files
  • Updated relevant unit tests or have written new unit tests, which should consider realistic data scenarios and edge cases, e.g. empty datasets, errors, boundary cases etc. - See Unit Test Guide
  • If you removed/replaced any function and/or function parameters, did you fully follow the deprecation guidance?
  • Review the Cheat Sheet. Make any required updates to it by editing the file inst/cheatsheet/admiral_cheatsheet.pptx and re-upload a PDF and a PNG version of it to the same folder. (The PNG version can be created by taking a screenshot of the PDF version.)
  • Update to all relevant roxygen headers and examples, including keywords and families. Refer to the categorization of functions to tag appropriate keyword/family.
  • Run devtools::document() so all .Rd files in the man folder and the NAMESPACE file in the project root are updated appropriately
  • Address any updates needed for vignettes and/or templates
  • Update NEWS.md under the header # admiral (development version) if the changes pertain to a user-facing function (i.e. it has an @export tag) or documentation aimed at users (rather than developers). A Developer Notes section is available in NEWS.md for tracking developer-facing issues.
  • Build admiral site pkgdown::build_site() and check that all affected examples are displayed correctly and that all new functions occur on the "Reference" page.
  • Address or fix all lintr warnings and errors - lintr::lint_package()
  • Run R CMD check locally and address all errors and warnings - devtools::check()
  • Link the issue in the Development Section on the right hand side.
  • Address all merge conflicts and resolve appropriately
  • Pat yourself on the back for a job well done! Much love to your accomplishment!

@jeffreyad jeffreyad linked an issue Dec 18, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 18, 2024

Code Coverage

Package Line Rate Health
admiral 98%
Summary 98% (5190 / 5297)

@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ memory consumption. (#2590)
<summary>Developer Notes</summary>

- Created unit tests for developer internal function `restricted_imputed_dtc_dt()` (#2495)
- Adopted `data-raw/data` R Package Convention (#2427)
- Adopted `data-raw/data` R Package Convention (#2427, #2584)
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ooohh i like this tack on to this news entry :)

Copy link
Collaborator

@bms63 bms63 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems good to me! Nice to have the tests already making sure this works as intended.

Do any vignettes or examples use this? I guess they would of broken the checks anyways.

@jeffreyad
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Seems good to me! Nice to have the tests already making sure this works as intended.

Do any vignettes or examples use this? I guess they would of broken the checks anyways.

Yes, it's in vignette for Creating

Seems good to me! Nice to have the tests already making sure this works as intended.

Do any vignettes or examples use this? I guess they would of broken the checks anyways.

Yes, it is in vignettes/pk_adnca.Rmd but seems to work

R/data.R Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
R/data.R Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
jeffreyad and others added 2 commits December 19, 2024 09:19
Co-authored-by: Stefan Bundfuss <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Stefan Bundfuss <[email protected]>
@jeffreyad
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Looking at the pages built I noticed that another lookup table dose_freq_lookup is still in R/create_single_dose_dataset.R. I could move this one as well.

@bms63
Copy link
Collaborator

bms63 commented Dec 19, 2024

Looking at the pages built I noticed that another lookup table dose_freq_lookup is still in R/create_single_dose_dataset.R. I could move this one as well.

Thanks Jeff!!

@bms63
Copy link
Collaborator

bms63 commented Dec 19, 2024

@jeffreyad could you just double check nothing warning-like is happening in the templates for these updates. the check only returns failure when an error happens. Thanks!

@jeffreyad
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@jeffreyad could you just double check nothing warning-like is happening in the templates for these updates. the check only returns failure when an error happens. Thanks!

Sure

@jeffreyad
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@jeffreyad could you just double check nothing warning-like is happening in the templates for these updates. the check only returns failure when an error happens. Thanks!

Sure

No issues with templates

@bms63
Copy link
Collaborator

bms63 commented Dec 23, 2024

Thanks again @jeffreyad!!

@bms63 bms63 merged commit 068b108 into main Dec 23, 2024
19 checks passed
@bms63 bms63 deleted the 2584_country_code_lookup_should_be_moved_to_data branch December 23, 2024 14:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

General Issue: country_code_lookup should be moved to data
3 participants