Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature Request: Enhance derive_summary_records() and supersede get_summary_records() #2142

Closed
zdz2101 opened this issue Sep 28, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #2158
Closed
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request function re-work issues identified by function re-work gang - usually argument alignment, user friendliness

Comments

@zdz2101
Copy link
Collaborator

zdz2101 commented Sep 28, 2023

Feature Idea

derive_summary_records() should be updated such that it can work with dataset_add, dataset_ref, missing values while deprecating the analysis_var and summary_fun arguments.

get_summary_records() can be superseded with the addition of dataset_add per conversation here

Relevant Input

No response

Relevant Output

No response

Reproducible Example/Pseudo Code

No response

@zdz2101 zdz2101 self-assigned this Sep 28, 2023
@zdz2101 zdz2101 added function re-work issues identified by function re-work gang - usually argument alignment, user friendliness and removed programming labels Sep 28, 2023
zdz2101 pushed a commit that referenced this issue Oct 6, 2023
zdz2101 pushed a commit that referenced this issue Oct 24, 2023
zdz2101 pushed a commit that referenced this issue Oct 26, 2023
zdz2101 pushed a commit that referenced this issue Oct 26, 2023
zdz2101 pushed a commit that referenced this issue Oct 26, 2023
zdz2101 pushed a commit that referenced this issue Oct 26, 2023
zdz2101 pushed a commit that referenced this issue Oct 31, 2023
zdz2101 added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 3, 2023
zdz2101 added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 3, 2023
zdz2101 added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 6, 2023
zdz2101 added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 9, 2023
…mmary_records()` (#2158)

* feat: #2142 intiial superseding step

* rough draft without missing_values implementation

* rough draft of new enhancement

* feat: #2142 get a good clean slate

* feat: #2142 working enhanced function

* feat: #2142 add appropriate test suite

* feat: #2142 run styler, lintr, add news and roxygen documentation

* chore: #2142 spelling/grammar

* chore: #2142 fix test

* should we inform superseded

* retain deprecated arguments to pass cicd

* chore: #2142 add remotes for admiraldev for proper branching strategy

* min dev versioning

* Update DESCRIPTION

* chore: #2142 address feedback

* upversion our description page to match current version up on github

* docs: little note for running website versions

* feat: #2142 rename filter to filter_add

* Update R/derive_summary_records.R

Co-authored-by: Ben Straub <[email protected]>

* feat: #2142 get checks appropriately running

* roxygen stuff and vignettes

* chore: #2142 roxygen stuff

* get past check-templates

* finally get past templates

* feat: #2142 clear up missing_values usage

* chore: #2142 rename filter to filter_add internally in codebase too

* chore: #2142 adopt and address all other feedback

* missed a renaming

* feat: #2142 remove extra fluff for missing values

* update news blurb

* chore: #2142 update documentation based on feedback

---------

Co-authored-by: Zelos Zhu <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Daniel Sjoberg <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Jerry Johnson <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Ben Straub <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request function re-work issues identified by function re-work gang - usually argument alignment, user friendliness
1 participant