PMM-4817 move git tags script to pmm

[ademidoff]

PMM-4817

• PMM-4817 move create-tags script to pmm Percona-Lab/jenkins-pipelines#2217

Note: please review the linked PR as well.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #2376 (ed1bd43) into main (1b80abb) will increase coverage by 0.03%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2376      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   42.78%   42.81%   +0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         385      385              
  Lines       48157    48157              
==========================================
+ Hits        20602    20620      +18     
+ Misses      25615    25597      -18     
  Partials     1940     1940              

Flag	Coverage Δ
admin	10.45% <ø> (+0.04%)	⬆️
agent	52.66% <ø> (+0.12%)	⬆️
managed	44.03% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
vmproxy	69.69% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 4 files with indirect coverage changes

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

[ademidoff]

@artemgavrilov The codecov check is disrupting the flow. Can we do something about it?

[BupycHuk]

what do you think if we write the code in Go instead of Bash, we don't have enough Bash experts in our team to maintain it

[artemgavrilov]

@artemgavrilov The codecov check is disrupting the flow. Can we do something about it?

I have an idea, but it's based on non-GA feature in go. In general root of the problem that we run agent tests multiple times on different DB versions and generate one report. So last run wins, because of that we have this flip-flop coverage for agent. In recent go versions were added binary format for coverage reports, and there is a command that can merge multiple reports into one. But for unit tests binary format is not GA option yet.

[ademidoff]

@artemgavrilov The codecov check is disrupting the flow. Can we do something about it?

I have an idea, but it's based on non-GA feature in go. In general root of the problem that we run agent tests multiple times on different DB versions and generate one report. So last run wins, because of that we have this flip-flop coverage for agent. In recent go versions were added binary format for coverage reports, and there is a command that can merge multiple reports into one. But for unit tests binary format is not GA option yet.

Do you think we can use this feature for the tests?

[artemgavrilov]

@artemgavrilov The codecov check is disrupting the flow. Can we do something about it?

I have an idea, but it's based on non-GA feature in go. In general root of the problem that we run agent tests multiple times on different DB versions and generate one report. So last run wins, because of that we have this flip-flop coverage for agent. In recent go versions were added binary format for coverage reports, and there is a command that can merge multiple reports into one. But for unit tests binary format is not GA option yet.

Do you think we can use this feature for the tests?

I created ticket for that: https://jira.percona.com/browse/PMM-12365
You can try to solve this problem if you want.