Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

K8SPXC-377: Check for custom user names uniqueness. #1910

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 12, 2024

Conversation

inelpandzic
Copy link
Contributor

@inelpandzic inelpandzic commented Dec 11, 2024

K8SPXC-377 Powered by Pull Request Badge

CHANGE DESCRIPTION

Problem:
When multiple users with the same name are present, unexpected results occur.

Solution:
Validate user for uniqueness. If there are duplicates reject the CR as invalid.

CHECKLIST

Jira

  • Is the Jira ticket created and referenced properly?
  • Does the Jira ticket have the proper statuses for documentation (Needs Doc) and QA (Needs QA)?
  • Does the Jira ticket link to the proper milestone (Fix Version field)?

Tests

  • Is an E2E test/test case added for the new feature/change?
  • Are unit tests added where appropriate?
  • Are OpenShift compare files changed for E2E tests (compare/*-oc.yml)?

Config/Logging/Testability

  • Are all needed new/changed options added to default YAML files?
  • Are all needed new/changed options added to the Helm Chart?
  • Did we add proper logging messages for operator actions?
  • Did we ensure compatibility with the previous version or cluster upgrade process?
  • Does the change support oldest and newest supported PXC version?
  • Does the change support oldest and newest supported Kubernetes version?

@hors hors merged commit 317c7bb into main Dec 12, 2024
15 of 16 checks passed
@hors hors deleted the K8SPXC-377-unique-user-name branch December 12, 2024 09:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
size/XS 0-9 lines
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants