Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Stuff #194

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Feb 12, 2025
Merged

Stuff #194

merged 10 commits into from
Feb 12, 2025

Conversation

jacekv
Copy link
Member

@jacekv jacekv commented Feb 7, 2025

What type of PR is this? (check all applicable)

  • Refactor
  • Feature
  • Bug Fix
  • Optimization
  • Documentation Update

Description

Related Tickets & Documents

  • Related Issue #
  • Closes #

QA Instructions

Please replace this line with instructions on how to test your changes.

[optional] Are there any post deployment tasks we need to perform?

@jacekv jacekv marked this pull request as ready for review February 12, 2025 10:25
@jacekv jacekv requested a review from a team as a code owner February 12, 2025 10:25
Copy link
Contributor

@jpantos jpantos left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A few comments, lgtm

docker-compose.override.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docker-compose.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
is_supported_protocol_version as _is_supported_protocol_version_by_common

_SUPPORTED_PROTOCOL_VERSIONS: typing.Final[set[semantic_version.Version]] = {
semantic_version.Version('0.2.0'),
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we need this?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The current contract on our chains are on 0.2.0. If we make a release this week without updating the contracts, we might potentially break something. Therefore I left it inside to make sure that we are compatible with the current contracts.

@jacekv jacekv self-assigned this Feb 12, 2025
@juanmanuel-tirado juanmanuel-tirado merged commit 83b8989 into pantos-io:main Feb 12, 2025
10 of 11 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants