feat(linter): create the import/order rule

[Spoutnik97]

all cases are not covered bu the architecture is setup

[graphite-app]

How to use the Graphite Merge Queue

Add either label to this PR to merge it via the merge queue:

• 0-merge - adds this PR to the back of the merge queue
• hotfix - for urgent hot fixes, skip the queue and merge this PR next

You must have a Graphite account in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link.

An organization admin has enabled the Graphite Merge Queue in this repository.

Please do not merge from GitHub as this will restart CI on PRs being processed by the merge queue.

[codspeed-hq]

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #7903 will not alter performance

_{Comparing Spoutnik97:linter/order (391506f) with main (4727667)}

Summary

✅ 29 untouched benchmarks

[Boshen]

It seems like this is for https://github.com/import-js/eslint-plugin-import/blob/main/docs/rules/order.md and not https://eslint.org/docs/latest/rules/sort-imports

Biome also has a separate import sorting step https://biomejs.dev/analyzer/import-sorting/

I wonder what the differences are.

[Sysix]

@Spoutnik97 thanks for the work 👍

It feels like you are going to the trouble of making your own file with tests. Please have a look how to setup a new rule:
https://oxc.rs/docs/contribute/linter/adding-rules.html

The just commands looks to be outdated🙃 . The listed commands can also be found here:
https://github.com/oxc-project/oxc/blob/main/justfile#L159-L199

[Spoutnik97]

@Sysix oh great! Indeed I didn't know this refreshed list

[Spoutnik97]

https://github.com/import-js/eslint-plugin-import/blob/main/docs/rules/order.md

@Boshen yes indeed, this is for this rule

It seems that differences are you cannot customize the order/groups with biomejs

[camc314]

i don't think this snap should be committed

[camc314]

We've also got #7197 which we were considering implementing

I would suggest we perhaps make an issue for this with one rule (maybe oxc) to cover all/most cases? my reasoning for this is that we don't really want two rules doing almost the same thing

We cam probable remove a few of the config options from eslint-plugin-import to help it get shipped quicker and to avoid having to support incredibly complex configrations

[Spoutnik97]

I just improved the rule by covering more use cases. Indeed, it would be better to don't have duplicate rule effects
I fixed tests and move to the right folders

[Spoutnik97]

Performances issues are fixed.
All checks passed