AO3-6875 Add additional wrangling status filtering options to tag search

[metallicity]

Pull Request Checklist

• Have you read "How to write the perfect pull request"?
• Have you read the contributing guidelines?
• Have you added tests for any changed functionality?
• Have you added the Jira issue number
  as the first thing in your pull request title (e.g. AO3-1234 Fix thing)
• Do you have fewer than 5 pull requests already open? If not, please wait
  until they are reviewed and merged before creating new pull requests.

Issue

https://otwarchive.atlassian.net/browse/AO3-6875

Purpose

This PR expands the existing options for filtering based on wrangling status on the Tag Search page. Previously, users could only filter on canonical tags, non-canonical tags, or both. Now the options also allow distinguishing between tags that are synonyms of canonical tags, in every combination of these wrangling statuses.

(Notably, this includes a "Canonical or synonymous" option that was omitted from the original ticket description. It seemed like an obviously useful addition, and required no additional tracking within the tag index data model to support, but it would be easy enough to remove it from the page if there is some concern over showing too many options to the user.)

Testing Instructions

1. Identify or create a set of canonical, synonymous, and non-canonical and non-synonymous tags.
2. Search for each tag by name (or all tags at once if they share one or more distinct words in their names)
3. Any canonical tag should appear only when selecting the following wrangling status options: "Canonical", "Canonical or synonymous", "Any status"
4. Any synonymous tag should appear only when selecting the following wrangling status options: "Non-canonical", "Synonymous", "Canonical or synonymous", "Any status"
5. Any non-canonical and non-synonymous tag should appear only when selecting the following wrangling status options: "Non-canonical", "Non-canonical and non-synonymous", "Any status"

References

#4144 - Original PR introducing the "wrangling status" section of the Tag Search page

Credit

Metallicity (they/them)

[sarken]

Hi, Metallicity!

Thank you so much for this pull request. I'm checking in with the Tag Wrangling team about whether they'd like the "Canonical or synonymous" option added, and someone will be along to review the code soon.

In the meantime, I've updated the Jira issue status to In Review, so no one will mistakenly create a duplicate pull request. If you'd like the ability to comment on, assign, and transition issues in the future, you're welcome to create a Jira account! You can just reply here with the account name and we'll set up the permissions for you. (It makes things a bit easier for us on the organizational side if the Full Name on your Jira account either closely matches the name you'd like us to credit in the release notes or includes it in parentheses, e.g. "Nickname (CREDIT NAME).")

Thanks again for contributing! If you have any questions, you can contact us at [email protected].

[metallicity]

@sarken I just joined the otwarchive Jira with an account named "Metallicity".

[sarken]

@metallicity Great! I've given your account the permissions I mentioned and updated the issue to assign it to you and add your testing instructions. The Tag Wrangling team has also approved the inclusion of the "Canonical or synonymous" option, so this is ready for review!

I did notice some Reviewdog comments about using the old ts() method when I glanced at the code while updating the Jira issue. If you'd like some info on how to deal with those comments, you can check out our Internationalization (i18n) Standards wiki page.

[metallicity]

I moved all the "wrangling status" option labels into en.yml, as well as the more low hanging fruit from the rest of the page. But there are several non-obvious sections on the Tag Search page, particularly the tag types radio button set and the sort by/sort direction drop downs, which I'm not sure have an established i18n convention within the codebase. Regardless, all of those sections are unrelated to the PR itself.