Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Export document to jsonFile one by one #131

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: v2
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

letterbeezps
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

json.go Outdated
if err != nil {
return err
}

return ioutil.WriteFile(exportPath, jsonString, os.ModePerm)
if _, err = f.WriteString("]"); err != nil {
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

When possible, like in this case, I prefer using the := operator

err = db.ForEach(q, func(doc *d.Document) bool {
n++
jsonByte, err := json.Marshal(doc.AsMap())
if err != nil {
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it would be a good idea to recover this error in the outer scope.
If there is any failure inside this function, then the export process would not report an error, but the result would be clearly not correct.

json.go Outdated
if n != collectionCount {
jsonString += ","
}
_, err = f.WriteString(jsonString)
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess same thing for this error

Copy link
Owner

@ostafen ostafen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey, @letterbeezps, first of all thank you for your contribution, you are doing a great job with the last PRs. The structure looks good, I only left some minor comments.

@ostafen ostafen linked an issue Jun 21, 2023 that may be closed by this pull request
}

jsonString, err := json.Marshal(docs)
n := 0
err = db.ForEach(q, func(doc *d.Document) bool {
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The Count() and the ForEach() statements run in separate transactions. Thus, if new documents are inserted between them, the ForEach() statement will iterate a number of documents n > collectionCount, which would lead to some problem with the statement:

if n != collectionCount {
	jsonString += ","
}

To prevent this issue, we can ensure the number of documents iterated by the ForEach() is exactly collectionCount using Limit():

err = db.ForEach(q.Limit(collectionCount), func(doc *d.Document) bool {

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You remind me that is can also cause problems when documents are deleted between them.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have a suggestion for ForEach() function, let consumer() return error instead of bool. If there is any failure inside this function, we can get the error info directly

func (db *DB) ForEach(q *query.Query, consumer func(_ *d.Document) error) error {
	q, err := normalizeCriteria(q)
	if err != nil {
		return err
	}

	return db.IterateDocs(q, func(doc *d.Document) error {
		if err := consumer(doc); err != nil {
			return err
		}
		return nil
	})
}

json.go Outdated

result, err := db.FindAll(query.NewQuery(collectionName))
q := query.NewQuery(collectionName)
collectionCount, err := db.Count(q)
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would just call this variable count, for simplicity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Memory efficient ExportCollection()
2 participants