Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

palan-versus-steno.md: add a missing word #6

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: gh-pages
Choose a base branch
from
Open

palan-versus-steno.md: add a missing word #6

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion _posts/2016-08-21-palan-versus-steno.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ Stenography is much more popular than Palantype. There are still many schools te

### Simplicity

Stenography has fewer keys than the Palantype, but that means that the Palantype has fewer conflicts. One issue common to both systems is that the stenographer/palantypist needs to resolve phonetic conflicts. For example, "there", "their", and "they're" all sound the same, but have different meanings. It is slightly easier to resolve these conflicts with the Palantype due to its higher number of keys and disambiguators. For this reason, the learning curve on the Palantype is less.
Stenography has fewer keys than the Palantype, but that means that the Palantype has fewer conflicts. One issue common to both systems is that the stenographer/palantypist needs to resolve phonetic conflicts. For example, "there", "their", and "they're" all sound the same, but have different meanings. It is slightly easier to resolve these conflicts with the Palantype due to its higher number of keys and disambiguators. For this reason, the learning curve on the Palantype is less steep.

### Ergonomics

Expand Down