Skip to content

ROX-28929: Patch release notes #92119

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

kcarmichael08
Copy link
Contributor

@kcarmichael08 kcarmichael08 commented Apr 11, 2025

Version(s):
4.5+

Issue

Link to docs preview

QE review: ACS has no QE, approved by SME

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Apr 11, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Apr 11, 2025

@kcarmichael08: This pull request references ROX-28929 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.5+

Issue

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Apr 11, 2025
@kcarmichael08 kcarmichael08 force-pushed the ROX-28929-patch-release-notes branch from bb02dd4 to ee41def Compare April 11, 2025 20:02
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Apr 11, 2025

@kcarmichael08: This pull request references ROX-28929 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.5+

Issue

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Same issues in patch as #92016 - will update to match after Agil inputs reviewer comments

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link

ocpdocs-previewbot commented Apr 11, 2025

🤖 Mon Apr 14 19:21:05 - Prow CI generated the docs preview:
https://92119--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app
Complete list of updated preview URLs: artifacts/updated_preview_urls.txt

@kcarmichael08 kcarmichael08 force-pushed the ROX-28929-patch-release-notes branch from ee41def to 40e6324 Compare April 14, 2025 15:03
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Apr 14, 2025

@kcarmichael08: This pull request references ROX-28929 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.5+

Issue

Link to docs preview

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Same issues in patch as #92016 - will update to match after Agil inputs reviewer comments

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@kcarmichael08 kcarmichael08 force-pushed the ROX-28929-patch-release-notes branch from 40e6324 to 4c63966 Compare April 14, 2025 15:24
@kcarmichael08 kcarmichael08 added this to the Continuous Release milestone Apr 14, 2025
Copy link

@davdhacs davdhacs left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good. ty!

@kcarmichael08 kcarmichael08 added peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR and removed peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR labels Apr 14, 2025
@kcarmichael08 kcarmichael08 force-pushed the ROX-28929-patch-release-notes branch 2 times, most recently from 5282b4f to 6a426fb Compare April 14, 2025 18:31
@kcarmichael08 kcarmichael08 force-pushed the ROX-28929-patch-release-notes branch from 6a426fb to 4670699 Compare April 14, 2025 19:09
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Apr 14, 2025

@kcarmichael08: This pull request references ROX-28929 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.5+

Issue

Link to docs preview

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Same issues in patch as #92016 - will update to match after Agil inputs reviewer comments

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Apr 14, 2025

@kcarmichael08: This pull request references ROX-28929 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.5+

Issue

Link to docs preview

QE review: ACS has no QE, approved by SME

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@kcarmichael08 kcarmichael08 added the peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR label Apr 14, 2025
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 14, 2025

@kcarmichael08: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@lpettyjo lpettyjo added peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR and removed peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR labels Apr 15, 2025
@lpettyjo lpettyjo self-requested a review April 15, 2025 13:06
Copy link
Contributor

@lpettyjo lpettyjo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@lpettyjo lpettyjo added peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR and removed peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR labels Apr 15, 2025
@kcarmichael08 kcarmichael08 merged commit 005d7fa into openshift:rhacs-docs-4.5 Apr 15, 2025
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR rhacs-docs-4.5 size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants