Skip to content

WIP OCPBUGS-44842: Bump library-go to cert-annotations-not-before-not-after branch #1768

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

vrutkovs
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Nov 21, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@vrutkovs: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-44842, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target either version "4.18." or "openshift-4.18.", but it targets "4.19.0" instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@vrutkovs vrutkovs changed the title OCPBUGS-44842: Bump library-go to cert-annotations-not-before-not-after branch WIP OCPBUGS-44842: Bump library-go to cert-annotations-not-before-not-after branch Nov 21, 2024
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Nov 21, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 21, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: vrutkovs

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Nov 21, 2024
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Nov 21, 2024
@vrutkovs vrutkovs force-pushed the cert-annotations-not-before-not-after branch from 40b1619 to 6e95a11 Compare November 22, 2024 07:56
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Nov 22, 2024
@vrutkovs vrutkovs force-pushed the cert-annotations-not-before-not-after branch from 6e95a11 to fb599ec Compare November 22, 2024 09:12
@vrutkovs vrutkovs force-pushed the cert-annotations-not-before-not-after branch from c961d79 to 4204f52 Compare November 26, 2024 09:06
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.
Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Feb 25, 2025
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Feb 25, 2025
@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link
Contributor

PR needs rebase.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 19, 2025

@vrutkovs: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-operator-encryption-single-node 40b1619 link false /test e2e-gcp-operator-encryption-single-node
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-operator-encryption-aesgcm 40b1619 link false /test e2e-gcp-operator-encryption-aesgcm
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-operator-encryption-aescbc 40b1619 link false /test e2e-gcp-operator-encryption-aescbc
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-operator-single-node 4204f52 link false /test e2e-gcp-operator-single-node
ci/prow/okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn 4204f52 link false /test okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn
ci/prow/e2e-aws-operator-disruptive-single-node 4204f52 link false /test e2e-aws-operator-disruptive-single-node
ci/prow/verify 4204f52 link true /test verify
ci/prow/okd-scos-images 4204f52 link true /test okd-scos-images
ci/prow/verify-deps 4204f52 link true /test verify-deps
ci/prow/k8s-e2e-gcp 4204f52 link true /test k8s-e2e-gcp
ci/prow/images 4204f52 link true /test images
ci/prow/unit 4204f52 link true /test unit
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-serial 4204f52 link true /test e2e-aws-ovn-serial
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-operator 4204f52 link true /test e2e-gcp-operator
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn 4204f52 link true /test e2e-aws-ovn
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade 4204f52 link true /test e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity.
Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle rotten
/remove-lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Apr 19, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants