Skip to content

API-1845: [KMS] Image reference render aws-kms-encryption-provider payload image #1766

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

swghosh
Copy link
Member

@swghosh swghosh commented Nov 14, 2024

Render aws-kms-encryption-provider image from release payload.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Nov 14, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 14, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: swghosh
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign dgrisonnet for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@swghosh swghosh marked this pull request as draft November 14, 2024 13:57
@swghosh swghosh changed the title WIP: [KMS] Image reference render aws-kms-encryption-provider payload image API-1843,API-1845: WIP: [KMS] Image reference render aws-kms-encryption-provider payload image Nov 15, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Nov 15, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 15, 2024

@swghosh: This pull request references API-1843 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the task to target the "4.18.0" version, but no target version was set.

This pull request references API-1845 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the task to target the "4.18.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Render aws-kms-encryption-provider image from release payload.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@swghosh swghosh changed the title API-1843,API-1845: WIP: [KMS] Image reference render aws-kms-encryption-provider payload image API-1844,API-1845: WIP: [KMS] Image reference render aws-kms-encryption-provider payload image Nov 15, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 15, 2024

@swghosh: This pull request references API-1844 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the task to target the "4.18.0" version, but no target version was set.

This pull request references API-1845 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the task to target the "4.18.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Render aws-kms-encryption-provider image from release payload.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.
Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Feb 14, 2025
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity.
Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle rotten
/remove-lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Mar 16, 2025
@swghosh swghosh changed the title API-1844,API-1845: WIP: [KMS] Image reference render aws-kms-encryption-provider payload image API-1844,API-1845: [KMS] Image reference render aws-kms-encryption-provider payload image Apr 16, 2025
@swghosh
Copy link
Member Author

swghosh commented Apr 16, 2025

/remove-lifecycle rotten

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. label Apr 16, 2025
@swghosh swghosh marked this pull request as ready for review April 16, 2025 06:23
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Apr 16, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from dgrisonnet and sanchezl April 16, 2025 06:23
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 16, 2025

@swghosh: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade 5ab1cb0 link true /test e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade
ci/prow/k8s-e2e-gcp 5ab1cb0 link true /test k8s-e2e-gcp
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-single-node 5ab1cb0 link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-single-node
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-operator-single-node 5ab1cb0 link false /test e2e-gcp-operator-single-node
ci/prow/okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn 5ab1cb0 link false /test okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn
ci/prow/e2e-metal-single-node-live-iso 5ab1cb0 link false /test e2e-metal-single-node-live-iso
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-serial 5ab1cb0 link true /test e2e-aws-ovn-serial
ci/prow/e2e-azure-ovn 5ab1cb0 link false /test e2e-azure-ovn
ci/prow/unit 5ab1cb0 link true /test unit
ci/prow/k8s-e2e-gcp-serial 5ab1cb0 link false /test k8s-e2e-gcp-serial
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-operator 5ab1cb0 link true /test e2e-gcp-operator
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn 5ab1cb0 link true /test e2e-aws-ovn
ci/prow/e2e-aws-operator-disruptive-single-node 5ab1cb0 link false /test e2e-aws-operator-disruptive-single-node

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@swghosh swghosh changed the title API-1844,API-1845: [KMS] Image reference render aws-kms-encryption-provider payload image API-1845: [KMS] Image reference render aws-kms-encryption-provider payload image Apr 18, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Apr 18, 2025

@swghosh: This pull request references API-1845 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the task to target the "4.19.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Render aws-kms-encryption-provider image from release payload.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants