Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Backport 2.8] Fix getAlerts RBAC problem (#991) #999

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 11, 2023

Conversation

opensearch-trigger-bot[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

Backport c535349 from #997

Signed-off-by: Ashish Agrawal <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit c535349)
@lezzago lezzago changed the title [Backport 2.8] [Backport 2.x] Fix getAlerts RBAC problem (#991) [Backport 2.8] Fix getAlerts RBAC problem (#991) Jul 11, 2023
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 11, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #999 (08047b6) into 2.8 (4277977) will increase coverage by 0.14%.
The diff coverage is 61.11%.

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##                2.8     #999      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     75.20%   75.35%   +0.14%     
  Complexity      116      116              
============================================
  Files           141      141              
  Lines          8418     8422       +4     
  Branches       1203     1204       +1     
============================================
+ Hits           6331     6346      +15     
+ Misses         1478     1463      -15     
- Partials        609      613       +4     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...rch/alerting/transport/TransportGetAlertsAction.kt 74.07% <61.11%> (-2.85%) ⬇️

... and 5 files with indirect coverage changes

@lezzago lezzago merged commit b887104 into 2.8 Jul 11, 2023
15 of 16 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot deleted the backport/backport-997-to-2.8 branch July 11, 2023 21:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants